Skip to content

Learning Computational Structure for Sample-Efficient Prediction

Oct 2026 · 0 citations · 54 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Inspired by the spatial organization of biological neural circuits, LeWi is introduced: each neuron has a learned low-dimensional embedding, only nearby neurons connect, and embeddings and weights are trained jointly, showing that jointly learning connectivity and weights can exploit computational structure to improve sample efficiency.

Abstract

Statistical learning in high dimensions suffers from the curse of dimensionality. Fortunately, many functions of practical interest are compositionally sparse, meaning they admit a composition of local functions, each depending on only a few variables, allowing sample complexity to depend on local arity rather than ambient dimension. Yet realizing this benefit requires exploiting hidden compositional structure, which theory does not establish for practical gradient-based training. We study this gap with CSFRBench, a controlled benchmark that hides the target's compositional computation during training but retains it for diagnosis, and find that dense networks and sparsity-based baselines leave much of that benefit unrealized. Inspired by the spatial organization of biological neural circuits, we introduce Learned Wiring (LeWi): each neuron has a learned low-dimensional embedding, only nearby neurons connect, and embeddings and weights are trained jointly. LeWi improves sample efficiency on targets with hierarchical structure, intermediate reuse, or independent modules. Across 32 additional targets generated by independently sampled computation graphs, LeWi is the most sample-efficient method not given the target graph, with 27% lower mean learning-curve area than dense networks. Dense networks perform better on targets with a single high-arity function. LeWi's representations and connectivity align with the target computation. On 17 world-model prediction tasks spanning control, navigation, and manipulation, LeWi beats the dense baseline on 16 and wins 99/119 baseline comparisons. These results show that jointly learning connectivity and weights can exploit computational structure to improve sample efficiency.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

LILA: Calibration-Free Structured Pruning of Large Language Models via Latent Spectral Geometry

Extending LILA to dynamically allocate sparsity budgets via KS-scores yields state-of-the-art generative preservation at moderate compression, while uncovering fundamental single-layer architectural bottlenecks at higher compression regimes.

Sankar Behera, Dhruv Singh, Anshika Agnihotri et al. · 1 citation
#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

Nested Sparsity for Scalable Pretraining and Continual Learning

Mixture-of-experts (MoE) transformers, the standard backbone for modern large-scale deep learning, employ conditional computation: only a sparse subset of model weights is used in each forward pass. In MoE transformers, this sparsity arises in the MoE operator, which generalizes the multi-layer perceptron in the classi...

Tian-Zhe Chu, Druv Pai, Y. Ma · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

Diminishing Returns of Data in Sparse Autoencoders: Functional Behavior does not Guarantee Feature Reproducibility

This work studies how much activation data SAEs need by training four SAE architectures on three language models with budgets ranging from 5M tokens to a 500M-token reference, and measures two notions of convergence: functional behavior on standard evaluations and one-to-one reproducibility of learned features.

Sambit Ghosh, Madelyn Mathai, R. Babu et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Learning Structured Sparsity for Large Models: Bridging Model Compressibility and Efficient Inference

Scaling laws continue to reward increases in model scale, while the resulting computational and memory demands drive greater reliance on cloud infrastructure for inference. Yet unreliable network connectivity, communication delays, and privacy requirements can make such reliance impractical, motivating local execution...

Tian-Xiang Xia, Li-On Kai, Niao He et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Learning Functional Subspaces for Neural Network Compression

Modern transformers pair impressive capabilities with substantial memory and compute demands. Low-rank weight factorization reduces both while keeping the matrices dense, and thus efficient on standard hardware. Existing methods, however, choose the subspace to remove from each weight matrix with local closed-form crit...

Massimo Bini, Anders Christensen, S. Alaniz et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 29, 2026

Who we become when we talk to machines

Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.