Skip to content
#diffusion models Open access

Deterministic Safety Standardization for Next-Generation Physical AI and Orbital Infrastructure: Sub-0.5ms Control Barrier Function Quadratic Programming (CBF-QP), FIPS 203 ML-KEM-768 Quantum Audit Records (QAR), and Systemic Risk Mitigation Protocols (SRMP) (和題: 次世代物理AI・宇宙インフラ安全標準化コンソーシアム基本論文:0.5ms未満の決定論的CBF-QPスーパーバイザー、ML-KEM-768量子監査記録[QAR]、およびシステムリスク軽減プロトコル[SRMP]による「必須の安全規格[License to Operate]」の数理・法制設計)

Oct 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy

Abstract

Contemporary general-purpose artificial intelligence (AGI) development led by frontier technology conglomerates remains overwhelmingly anchored in stochastic, autoregressive, and diffusion-based probabilistic inference. When deployed directly into safety-critical cyber-physical infrastructure and Low Earth Orbit (LEO) autonomous constellations, the absence of a deterministic physical-layer safety guarantee induces two existential failure modes: Temporal Blind Spots caused by communication and operating-system jitter, and Algorithmic Flash Crashes (coupled multi-agent physical runaway). This monograph establishes the foundational mathematical, cryptographic, actuarial, and statutory architecture of the Next-Generation Physical AI and Space Infrastructure Safety Standardization Consortium. First, we formulate a bare-metal Control Barrier Function Quadratic Programming (CBF-QP) deterministic supervisor executed within a sub-0.5 ms Hard-In-The-Loop Optimization (HITLO) fabric via PHOENIX_BRIDGE optical interconnects, mathematically intercepting 100% of stochastic AI hallucinations prior to physical actuation. Second, we integrate ultra-low-latency post-quantum cryptography (NIST FIPS 203 ML-KEM-768 accelerated via 7-stage Incomplete Number Theoretic Transforms) with immutable Quantum Audit Records (QAR) verified in a zero-knowledge virtual machine (QFS-zkVM) over the 64-bit Goldilocks prime field F_p (p = 2^64 - 2^32 + 1). Third, we demonstrate how this architecture resolves critical bottlenecks across three strategic sectors: (1) eliminating mega-constellation collision cascades and discharging strict state liability under Article VII of the 1967 Outer Space Treaty for Defense and Aerospace Agencies (DoD, NASA) via the Autonomous Traffic Control System (ATCS); (2) bounding heavy-tailed AI catastrophe distributions via the Systemic Risk Mitigation Protocol (SRMP) to restore finite expected loss (E[L] < infinity) for Mega-Insurance, Reinsurance, and Catastrophe (CAT) Bond Markets; and (3) transcending the trade-off between overly conservative rule-based models (Mobileye RSS) and fragile end-to-end Deep Learning (Sim-to-Real gap) in Next-Generation Mobility and Robotics. Finally, we specify a two-phase global standardization roadmap coupling Q-SAFA decentralized bailout smart contracts with SEC Rule 15c3-5 pre-trade-style hardware interlocks and Delaware Caremark fiduciary oversight standards to establish the global mandatory "License to Operate" for autonomous cyber-physical infrastructure. License & Integrity Covenant: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) with Strict No-Learn Covenant (NLL-v1.0-2026). Author: Hasebe, Yoko (長谷部 洋子) — Lead Researcher, Autonomous Infrastructure Systems, Autonomous Living & Physical Infrastructure Institute, Iwakuni, Yamaguchi, Japan.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Open access Jun 2016

Software Development in Startup Companies: The Greenfield Startup Model

The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.

Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 178 citations · ⚡14
#computer vision Open access Oct 2016

Software Startups - A Research Agenda

Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.

M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al. · 157 citations · ⚡17
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#computer vision Review Open access May 2015

A survey study on major technical barriers affecting the decision to adopt cloud services

The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.

Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al. · 111 citations · ⚡8
#computer vision Open access Feb 2018

Lean Internal Startups for Software Product Innovation in Large Companies: Enablers and Inhibitors

This study investigates how Lean internal startup facilitates software product innovation in large companies and identifies its enablers and inhibitors, and shows the potential of the method-in-action framework to investigate the Lean startup approach in non-startup context.

Henry Edison, Nina M. Smørsgård, Xiaofeng Wang et al. · 78 citations · ⚡6
#computer vision Conference Sep 2010

Exploring the Sources of Waste in Kanban Software Development Projects

The application of agile software methods and more recently the integration of Lean practices contribute to the trend of continuous improvement in the software industry. One such area warranting proper empirical evidence is a project’s operational efficiency when using the Kanban method. This short paper takes a new an...

Marko Ikonen, Petri Kettunen, Nilay V. Oza et al. · 67 citations · ⚡9

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.