A blockwise optimizer that minimizes an independent cubic model per parameter tensor over the true block Hessian, under a per-block adaptive cubic constant and a monotone guard on the full loss.
Abstract
Cubic regularized Newton methods have the optimal $\mathcal{O}(\epsilon^{-3/2})$ global rate, but a dense subproblem solve limits the feasible block size. Scalable Cubic Newton variants replace the true block curvature with a diagonal, low-rank, Kronecker-factored, or sketched surrogate and, most often, give up the exact cubic step. We introduce a blockwise optimizer that minimizes an independent cubic model per parameter tensor over the true block Hessian, under a per-block adaptive cubic constant and a monotone guard on the full loss. Arbitrarily large tensors are handled matrix-free in a Lanczos-built Krylov subspace, where we prove that the step minimizes the cubic model. The theory also supplies the $\mathcal{O}(\epsilon^{-3/2})$ iteration complexity bound, a second-order guarantee, and monotone per-block descent. Four variants of this outer scheme are evaluated against the original adaptive regularization with cubics (ARC) optimizer, some other recent cubic Newton variants, Adam, SOAP, and L-BFGS. On a 91.4M-parameter implicit neural representation (INR), the variants introduced in this work are the only evaluated here cubic Newton methods whose steps stay exact on every block. Run to full convergence on FINER 2D image fitting, one of the ARC variants introduced here, ARC-$\varphi_1$, reaches 133.5 dB peak signal-to-noise ratio, while tuned Adam plateaus at 78.2 dB after about 70 minutes. In that time ARC-$\varphi_1$ reaches 95.6 dB.
A method is introduced whose number of iterations to reach an $\epsilon$-approximate solution is of the order of n, and whose number of iterations to $\epsilon$-approximation scales with $\frac{\beta{}D^2n}{\alpha}\log(1/\epsilon)$, in a meaningful regime.
Three inexact AL schemes are developed that preserve the standard AL subproblem structure and attain the optimal primal-dual complexity in the convex setting, improving prior AL bounds of $\mathcal O(\epsilon^{-4/3})$, $\mathcal O(\epsilon^{-7/4})$, and $\mathcal O(\epsilon^{-2})$, and removing the logarithmic factor f...
Arnesh Sujanani, Saeed Ghadimi, Henry Wolkowicz· 0 citations
We study whole-sequence convergence of the smoothing-based full-splitting proximal subgradient method (S-FSPS) for structured nonconvex and nonsmooth fractional programs, introduced by Bo\c{t}, Li, and Tao (SIAM J. Optim., 35(4):2623--2653, 2025) as Algorithm~4.1. Existing theory guarantees only the existence of a subs...
Four groups of subspace methods for nonlinear monotone equations, with applications to large-scale machine learning problems, using Jacobian-free subspace directions of conjugate-gradient type combined with either fixed step sizes or variable step sizes generated by the projected method of Solodov and Svaiter are intro...
M. Kimiaei, Shima Shabani, Michael Breuß· 0 citations
A hyperbolic-majorization preconditioned three-term nonlinear conjugate-gradient framework for nonconvex finite minimax optimization that yields a Dai--Liao-type conjugacy relation, enhanced sufficient descent, a smoothing-parameter-uniform Armijo lower bound, fixed-smoothing global first-order convergence and complexi...
We introduce two novel randomized iterative regularization frameworks, termed \texttt{RIGKT} and \texttt{RIAT}, for solving large-scale linear ill-posed inverse problems governed by systems of equations. The proposed methods combine randomized iterated Tikhonov regularization with Krylov subspace projection techniques,...
Ravi Verma, Harshit Bajpai, Ankik Kumar Giri· arXiv.org· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.