Skip to content
Open access

Comparative efficacy of Statin Monotherapy, Statin–Ezetimibe Dual Therapy, and Statin–Ezetimibe–Bempedoic Acid Triple Therapy in patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Prospective comparative study

Oct 2026 · International Journal of Drug Delivery Technology · 0 citations · 5 references

TL;DR

Triple therapy consisting of a statin, ezetimibe, and bempedoic acid achieved significantly greater LDL-C reduction and superior LDL-C target attainment compared with statin monotherapy or statin–ezetimibe dual therapy in patients with ACS.

Abstract

Background: Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remain at very high risk for recurrent cardiovascular events despite contemporary therapy. Current guidelines recommend aggressive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction following ACS. Although statins remain the cornerstone of lipid-lowering therapy, many patients fail to achieve recommended LDL-C targets with statin monotherapy. Ezetimibe and bempedoic acid provide additional LDL-C lowering through complementary mechanisms and may improve target attainment in high-risk patients. Objectives: To compare the efficacy of statin monotherapy, statin plus ezetimibe therapy, and statin plus ezetimibe plus bempedoic acid therapy in reducing LDL-C levels and achieving guideline-recommended LDL-C targets among patients with ACS. Methods: This prospective comparative study was conducted in 300 patients with ACS between July 2024 and March 2026. Eligible patients with elevated LDL-C levels and no prior lipid-lowering therapy were allocated into three treatment groups: statin monotherapy (n=100), statin plus ezetimibe (n=100), and statin plus ezetimibe plus bempedoic acid (n=100). LDL-C levels were assessed at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months. The primary outcome was percentage reduction in LDL-C levels. Secondary outcomes included absolute LDL-C reduction and achievement of LDL-C target <55 mg/dL. Results: All treatment groups demonstrated significant reductions in LDL-C levels during follow-up. At 3 months, mean LDL-C levels decreased to 53.0 ± 16.6 mg/dL in the statin monotherapy group, 44.8 ± 14.2 mg/dL in the statin plus ezetimibe group, and 36.6 ± 16.1 mg/dL in the triple therapy group. Percentage LDL-C reductions were 52.0%, 60.6%, and 75.7%, respectively. LDL-C target attainment (<55 mg/dL) at 3 months was achieved in 64.2% of patients receiving statin monotherapy, 80.7% receiving statin plus ezetimibe, and 90.9% receiving triple therapy. Intergroup differences were statistically significant (ANOVA F=23.43, p<0.001). Conclusion: Triple therapy consisting of a statin, ezetimibe, and bempedoic acid achieved significantly greater LDL-C reduction and superior LDL-C target attainment compared with statin monotherapy or statin–ezetimibe dual therapy in patients with ACS. Early intensive combination lipid-lowering therapy may represent an effective strategy for achieving guideline-recommended LDL-C goals in very high-risk patients.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Oct 2026

Early efficacy of oral lipid lowering therapy in achieving LDL-C targets following acute coronary syndrome: A real-world observational study

Low LDL-C target attainment following ACS remains suboptimal despite high-intensity statin therapy, highlighting the need for earlier and more intensive lipid-lowering strategies in high-risk Indian patients.

A. Gautam, Sudesh Prajapathi, Abhishek Singh et al. · 1 citation
Open access Sep 2026

Ezetimibe Versus Alirocumab and Plaque Vulnerability in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Not Achieving LDL-Cholesterol Target with Statin Therapy: The COMBI-LLT-ACS Randomized Trial

Objective: To compare two lipid-lowering therapy strategies involving Ezetimibe and Alirocumab on the vulnerability of atherosclerotic plaque (AP) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) not achieving the LDL-cholesterol target while on intensive statin therapy. Methods: Combi-LLT-ACS (Patients receiving combina...

A. Kovalskaya, G. Bikbaeva, D. Duplyakov et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

High-Risk Dyslipidemia: Lipid targets, high-intensity statins, and novel lipid-lowering agents

High-risk dyslipidemia is a treatment problem defined less by an isolated cholesterol value than by the interaction between atherogenic lipoprotein burden and absolute cardiovascular risk. This structured narrative review examines contemporary lipid targets, the role of high-intensity statins, and the place of newer li...

F. D. de Souza, Laura Leme de Araújo Rodrigues da Silva, Nicolas Victor Camargo Chon et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Predicting LDL-cholesterol reduction variability on statin-ezetimibe therapy: insights from "Jena auf Ziel".

Upfront dual therapy with atorvastatin (80 mg) and ezetimibe (10 mg) achieved robust LDL‑C reduction with low interindividual variability in treatment-naive individuals, which supports current guideline recommendations for immediate combination therapy in very high-risk patients, irrespective of their baseline metaboli...

U. Makhmudova, D. Lütjohann, F. Haertel et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Drug Utilization of Statin Therapy in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome at the Cardiology and Cardiovascular Outpatient Clinic of Airlangga University Hospital

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains a major cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and intensive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction with high-intensity statin therapy is essential for secondary prevention. This study aimed to evaluate statin utilization, treatment appropriateness, drug-re...

E. Hartanto, Deny Wilson Amanda Sitorus, W. Nilamsari et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Hybutimibe, an innovative cholesterol absorption inhibitor for lipid-lowering therapy: current evidence and future perspectives

Achievement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets is crucial for the prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). As first-line lipid-lowering drugs, statins often fail to achieve adequate LDL-C control rates in clinical practice due to individual variations in efficacy, safety concern...

Sha Li, Hui-Hui Liu, Jian-Jun Li · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.