The Capacity of Thought: Benchmarking Llama 3.2 in Semantic fMRI Neural Language Decoding and Improving the Huth Encoding-Model Baseline
TL;DR
The results demonstrate that high-capacity language models do not inherently improve fMRI decoding and can actively obscure failures without rigorous blind-control evaluation.
Abstract
Decoding continuous language from fMRI signals remains a core challenge in non-invasive brain-computer interface research. We present two complementary investigations. First, we improve the Huth et al. ridge regression encoding pipeline through expanded voxel selection (10K->15K), substitution of GPT-2 medium for GPT-1 as the beam-search proposal model, and GPU-accelerated bootstrap training, achieving mean METEOR = 0.149 and BLEU-1 = 0.200 across three held-out narratives for subject UTS03 -- an 11% relative METEOR gain over our replication baseline. Second, we introduce fMRIFlamingo, which maps BOLD activity to a frozen Llama-3.2-1B with trainable gated cross-attention layers via a learned brain tokenizer and a Perceiver Resampler. Despite achieving 42.86% Top-1 accuracy on a 1-in-100 ranking task, well above chance, a blind control ablation with zeroed fMRI inputs yields near-identical scores, revealing that apparent decoding success is driven primarily by the frozen language prior rather than by neural input. These results demonstrate that high-capacity language models do not inherently improve fMRI decoding and can actively obscure failures without rigorous blind-control evaluation.