MazeRunner is presented, an autonomous penetration testing system built on a three-agent task-and-clue orchestration framework that separates global orchestration, context-intensive execution, and failure-oriented review while persistently maintaining task states and environmental evidence.
Abstract
Penetration testing is essential yet resource-intensive. Although large language models (LLMs) show promise for automating security auditing, existing agents mainly execute end-to-end workflows in simplified linear scenarios. Real-world black-box testing is fundamentally nonlinear: the attack graph is initially unknown and must be incrementally inferred from environmental feedback. Observations may reveal multiple attack branches, failures are often ambiguous, and critical clues may span long action horizons. Existing agents therefore tend to become trapped in depth-first exploration, misdiagnose failures, and forget prior evidence. We present MazeRunner, an autonomous penetration testing system built on a three-agent task-and-clue orchestration framework. It separates global orchestration, context-intensive execution, and failure-oriented review while persistently maintaining task states and environmental evidence. This design supports action revision, prerequisite recovery, branch switching, and long-range clue correlation. We evaluate MazeRunner on 10 recently released HTB targets, limiting each system-target run to 20 million LLM tokens and preventing target-specific solution leakage. With Claude Sonnet 4.5, MazeRunner completes 47.7% of annotated subtasks, compared with 36.2% for PentestGPT-V2 and 34.2% for Claude Code. It achieves user-level or higher access on six targets, including root access on two; each same-model baseline reaches user-level access on only two targets and never obtains root access. Execution-trace analysis further shows that MazeRunner explores more attack branches and acquires shells more efficiently.
NetConfArena is presented, an executable benchmark for evaluating LLM agents in closed-loop network configuration, and its findings suggest two future directions: using validated trajectories as supervision signals to improve foundation models, and designing harness mechanisms that make agent execution more reliable an...
Chang Liu, Xiao-Hui Xie, Xinyi Chen et al.· 1 citation
DDBench is introduced, a code-repair benchmark of 60 historical bugs mined from 13 open-source distributed systems, partitioned into three difficulty tiers, isolating the effect of debugging context from model capability.
Yi-Bo Yan, Huijuan Wang, Jun-Zhou He et al.· 0 citations
Multi-agent systems built on large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed for complex tasks requiring autonomous planning, tool use, and inter-agent coordination. However, the non-deterministic nature of LLM outputs and the emergent behavior arising from agent interactions render traditional test oracles inef...
Gopalakrishnan Marimuthu· International Conference on...· 0 citations
Intentest is proposed, an intent-graph-guided automated penetration testing agent that externalizes long-horizon state from the LLM's context window onto a persistent fact-intent directed acyclic graph (DAG), thereby substantially reducing invalid transitions.
Wei-Zhe Wang, Yi-Tong Zhang, Yao Zhang et al.· 0 citations
Behavioral topology is shaped more by the deployment harness than by the LLM, providing a model-agnostic structural primitive for safety auditing and runtime monitoring, and addresses both prediction goals.
Seonglae Cho, F. Fernandez, Umar Mohammed et al.· 2 citations
ZhuLong is presented, an execution-grounded LLM coding agent for PyAether and SKILL that combines API retrieval, documentation inspection, and sandbox execution via unified MCP tools, augmented by an offline API self-exploration mechanism that infers undocumented API behaviors through counterfactual experimentation.
Yang Liu, Shiwei Hou, Xi-Yuan Chen et al.· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.