Skip to content

SingGuard-NSFA: Extensible Guardrails for Agentic AI via Generative Reasoning and Real-Time Classification

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.13081 · 2 citations · 28 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Results demonstrate the extensibility of the approach and its generality as a plug-in enhancement and ablation experiments show that classification heads can equip a guardrail with risk detection capabilities beyond its original scope and achieve state-of-the-art performance.

Abstract

We present nsfaguard, a guardrail framework for securing agentic AI systems against operational threats, such as prompt injection, sensitive information extraction, malicious code requests, dangerous tool misuse, and resource exhaustion. We first introduce the NSFA taxonomy, which organizes 185 risk variants into a CIA-triad-grounded hierarchy and is cross-validated against three well-established OWASP guidelines. Based on this taxonomy, we construct a benchmark suite spanning 133 languages, comprising over 93K purpose-built samples targeting both user queries and agent responses, along with 3,435 cross-source samples adapted from five public agent-security datasets. To detect these operational threats in practice, we develop a dual-mode approach combining SFT-based generative reasoning for interpretable offline auditing with discriminative classification heads on the frozen backbone, enabling real-time detection at approximately 50,ms. We release four models with 0.8B, 2B, 4B, and 9B parameters, all achieving $\geq$94% F1 on purpose-built benchmarks and surpassing the strongest competing guardrails by 6 to 12 absolute points. On cross-source evaluation, the 9B model attains 91.29% F1 with a more balanced precision--recall trade-off. Moreover, ablation experiments show that classification heads can equip a guardrail with risk detection capabilities beyond its original scope and achieve state-of-the-art performance. These results demonstrate the extensibility of the approach and its generality as a plug-in enhancement.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

SoK: Rethinking Jailbreaking in the Era of Agentic AI: Attacks, Defenses, and Practical Consideration

Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly evolving from conversational assistants into agentic AI systems that reason, plan, invoke tools, maintain persistent memory, communicate with other agents, and execute multi-step tasks. At the same time, modern models exhibit substantially stronger native safety alignment than e...

Md. Jueal Mia, Yanzhao Wu, S. Uluagac et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

REDAgentBench: Executable Red Teaming and Faithful Measurement of LLM Agent Systems

RedAgentBench is introduced, an executable framework for autonomous red-teaming and faithful measurement that shows that executable evaluation can improve safety measurement and identify actionable intervention points.

Zixing Chen, Xingyuan Liu, Jie Zhu et al. · 3 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

How Do LLM Agents Actually Get the Flag? Trace-Level Provenance for Agentic Offensive Security Evaluation

CTF-ABACUS is introduced, a trace-based agent auditing framework that reconstructs each run as an evidence-grounded solve profile that provides a basis for designing benchmarks that better isolate the offensive capabilities of autonomous language-model agents.

Kimberly Milner, Ming-Hao Shao, Nanda Rani et al. · 2 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.