Oct 2026· Acta Globalis Humanitatis et Linguarum· Vol 3, pp. 129-141· 0 citations
Abstract
Questions in English linguistics textbooks may introduce explanations, request student responses, or invite acceptance of conclusions presented as recoverable from context. These functions cannot be identified reliably from interrogative form or the presence of an immediate authorial answer alone. This conceptual article develops a contextual framework for distinguishing rhetorical questions from expository questions and instructional prompts in academic pedagogical discourse. It brings research on rhetorical questioning into dialogue with studies of metadiscourse, reader engagement, and discourse commitments. The analysis uses explicitly constructed textbook passages to examine answer availability, expected reader response, explanatory sequence, and the scope of the conclusion invited by a question. It produces a functional distinction between recognition of a textually supported answer, receipt of new explanatory information, and performance of an assigned analytical task. The examples also demonstrate why identical wording can receive different classifications when its discourse setting changes. Rhetorical questions are interpreted as resources for challenging overgeneralizations, consolidating inferences, and anticipating objections, while their possible effects on learner agency remain conditional. The article proposes an annotation procedure that preserves uncertain and mixed cases and outlines applications to English linguistics teaching in Azerbaijani higher education. Its contribution is an operational analytical framework rather than empirical evidence about textbook frequencies or learning outcomes.
English courtroom discourse is a regulated form of institutional interaction in which linguistic choices perform procedural actions, distribute speaking rights, construct evidence, and shape assessments of credibility. This article examines the theoretical and methodological foundations required to analyse its pragmati...
Bulbul Hajiyeva· EuroGlobal Journal of Lingui...· 0 citations
This study examines linguistic and stylistic over-elaboration in beginner Arabic writing produced during a classroom task permitting generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and electronic translation. The study emerged from an Arabic language course involving undergraduate accounting students at Universiti Teknologi...
Mahmoud Abd El Fattah Ibrahim Essa· Educational Innovation Resea...· 0 citations
Questions about EMI often begin from an apparently straightforward premise—does EMI improve students' English? This article argues that the question itself is the source of the main analytic problem. Using EMI as an exemplar of a wider problem in applied linguistics, we show why binary claims about language gain trav...
T. Hampson, James Mckinley, Ikuya Aizawa· TESOL Quarterly (Print)· 0 citations
Academic writers must justify their claims, make their interpretive position clear, and express conclusions with a degree of certainty that the evidence supports. This conceptual article examines how argumentation, authorial stance, and hedging interact in performing these tasks. It combines a selective synthesis of fo...
Sarjan Sadigova· Acta Globalis Humanitatis et...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.