CT ECV Mapper: an interactive 3D Slicer application with a batch-capable pipeline for voxelwise CT-derived extracellular volume mapping of the liver and hepatic tumors
TL;DR
Voxelwise CT ECV mapping of the liver and of hepatic tumors is feasible from conventional multiphase CT on an open platform, both interactively and as an unattended batch, with quality-control instrumentation that fails explicitly and diagnosably.
Abstract
Background. Extracellular volume fraction (ECV) derived from contrast-enhanced CT is a validated marker of hepatic fibrosis and has been reported to differ between hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. In published work it is obtained from a small number of hand-placed two-dimensional regions of interest, and the software that computes it is either tied to one manufacturer's workstation or based on spectral or dual-energy acquisition. We are not aware of an accessible tool that produces voxelwise liver ECV maps from conventional single-energy multiphase CT. Methods. We developed CT ECV Mapper, a scripted 3D Slicer extension with a three-layer architecture whose numerical core imports neither slicer nor vtk and is unit-tested outside 3D Slicer. The interactive application provides two-stage registration that the operator inspects and accepts before any ECV is computed, operator-placed three-dimensional regions of interest, user-adjustable calculation parameters, a voxelwise ECV color map and ROI statistics; the same logic layer can be driven unattended across a cohort. The tool was applied to the 164 patients of the public WAW-TACE multiphase HCC/TACE dataset that have both unenhanced and delayed-phase series. Results. 156 of 164 cases (95.1%) completed unattended. Whole-liver ECV had a median of 36.2% (interquartile range 31.9-41.5), consistent with published CT-ECV values for fibrotic and cirrhotic liver. Registering the arterial and portal phases on demand extended tumor ECV from the 38 lesions a conventional two-phase pipeline can reach to 248 lesions in 156 patients. Every failure was attributable to an identifiable mechanism: craniocaudal field-of-view mismatch between phases in six cases, aortic calcification within the blood-pool region in one, and in one case a labeling error in the source dataset, in which the series declared as unenhanced proved to be a second reconstruction of the portal venous phase; this was detected by the blood-pool validity check rather than by visual review. Conclusions. Voxelwise CT ECV mapping of the liver and of hepatic tumors is feasible from conventional multiphase CT on an open platform, both interactively and as an unattended batch, with quality-control instrumentation that fails explicitly and diagnosably. This is a technical development and feasibility report; the application has not been evaluated against a reference standard and no claim of clinical validity is made.