Skip to content
#federated learning Open access

Federated Learning For Fraud Detection: A Review

Oct 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data

Abstract

Fraud detection in banking and payments depends on learning from transaction data that institutions are often unable or unwilling to pool, because of privacy, regulatory, competitive, and security constraints. Federated learning (FL) offers an alternative in which institutions train a shared model by exchanging model updates rather than raw records. This review synthesizes selected scholarly works on FL for fraud detection, covering credit-card and payment fraud, financial-crime detection with graph learning, aggregation methods, non-IID data, class imbalance, differential privacy, secure aggregation, poisoning attacks, communication overhead, concept drift, and real-world deployment. Fraud-specific federated studies are compared with foundational FL, privacy, security, and fraud-detection literature. The literature suggests that FL is a plausible route to collaborative fraud detection, but that its benefits in the fraud setting depend on how well it handles extreme class imbalance, heterogeneous institutional data, evolving fraud patterns, and layered privacy and security protections. Many enabling results were obtained in non-fraud settings and should not be assumed to transfer unchanged. Because the review is based on a selected set of publications rather than an exhaustive database search, it is presented as a focused narrative review and not as a systematic review.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.