Skip to content
Review Open access

From Human to Hybrid: Artificial Intelligence and the Transformation of Language Services

Jul 2026 · Societies · Vol 16, pp. 236 · 0 citations · 15 references

TL;DR

Overall, the study suggests that, from the perspective of the surveyed professionals, AI is contributing to the reconfiguration of language-service practices, while reinforcing the continued importance of human judgement, linguistic expertise, ethical responsibility, and critical engagement with AI-generated outputs.

Abstract

The growing presence of artificial intelligence (AI) in everyday life has generated debate regarding its impact on language services, where tools such as Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being integrated. Framed as an exploratory and preliminary study, this article examines how a self-selected sample of 60 language-service professionals working in European contexts perceive the adoption of AI, particularly LLMs, in relation to professional practices, quality, ethical concerns, and emerging competence requirements. An embedded mixed-methods design was adopted, combining descriptive quantitative analysis with the thematic analysis of open-ended responses. The findings suggest a cautious and selective adoption of LLMs. While respondents recognise potential advantages related to speed, productivity, and support for specific tasks, they also identify persistent limitations concerning quality, terminology, contextual adequacy, cultural sensitivity, and the need for human revision. Respondents also report concerns about professional devaluation, changing work conditions, and the need for reskilling, particularly in relation to general translation and AI-assisted workflows. At the same time, some participants identify opportunities for innovation, enhanced human oversight, and the revaluation of specialised expertise. Overall, the study suggests that, from the perspective of the surveyed professionals, AI is contributing to the reconfiguration of language-service practices, while reinforcing the continued importance of human judgement, linguistic expertise, ethical responsibility, and critical engagement with AI-generated outputs.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Lifelong learning in an AI-driven world: assistance, personalization and automation under scrutiny

The review identifies a misalignment between the theoretical and policy-oriented framing of LLL and the practical deployment of AI in educational contexts, suggesting the need to move beyond technology-centred approaches and to design AI-supported lifelong learning initiatives that are explicitly connected to regional...

Gerardo Alfredo Rodríguez, Andrés Chiappe, Fabiola Sáez-Delgado · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN SOCIETY: POTENTIALS, RISKS AND RESPONSIBLE GOVERNANCE

This article examines GenAI applications, limits, and governance requirements, with particular attention to Brazil, and proposes the GERA-BR Framework, structured around seven connected movements: govern, frame, safeguard data, assess, conduct human review, trace, and learn.

Maria das Graças da Silva Souza, Klinger Arcanjo Dias, Stefano Eduardo Souza Bogo et al. · 0 citations
Open access 2022

The Future of Work: Human–AI Collaboration across Domains

It is concluded that the future of work will depend on co-evolutionary human-AI collaboration, requiring organizational restructuring, policy development, and ethical safeguards to ensure sustainable productivity and innovation.

V. Sethi · 0 citations
Open access 2026

Artificial intelligence in digital society

It has been confirmed that the key risk does not stem from the use of AI itself, but rather from the environment in which it operates, and that the younger generation is the most adaptable demographic group in the process of acculturation to AI.

Y. Melnyk, I. Pypenko · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Artificial Intelligence as a Personal Coach: A Narrative Review of Benefits and Risks in Educational and Health Contexts

Evidence suggests that purpose-built chatbot coaching systems may have some benefits as they are generally well received and can support short-term motivation and selected behavior change, but effects for sustained, meaningful outcomes are inconsistent.

Jason T. Potel, M. Kumashiro · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.