As with prior health-related technology innovations, aligning decisional priorities across stakeholders is critical to motivate impactful AI health technologies for older adults.
Abstract
Background Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to improve health among older adults, yet how different stakeholders decide to develop, finance, and adopt AI innovations is not well understood. Objective This study aimed to understand the decision-making of different stakeholders regarding AI and technologies for the health care of older adults. Methods We conducted semistructured interviews with 15 older adults and care partners, 15 clinicians, 8 health system or insurance leaders, 5 investors, and 6 technology developers. Data were analyzed using thematic content analysis. Results All stakeholders considered cost, value, and usability important in adopting AI health technologies but emphasized different aspects of each concept. Older adults and care partners prioritized out-of-pocket costs and ease of use, whereas payers emphasized disease prevalence and implementation feasibility. Developers and investors focused on profitability and scalability, resulting in tension with end users’ priorities. Participant suggestions included problem-driven design, greater stakeholder engagement, public-private partnerships, and educating older adults about AI. Conclusions As with prior health-related technology innovations, aligning decisional priorities across stakeholders is critical to motivate impactful AI health technologies for older adults.
Background: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping health and social care by enabling data-driven decision-making across clinical, operational, and strategic domains. AI offers new opportunities for integrated care work across community-based prevention and hospital-based treatment. However, concerns around bias, eq...
Marco Bardus, Derek Ward, Elinor Laws et al.· International Journal of Int...· 0 citations
Abstract Background AI is increasingly being integrated into diabetes care, with growing evidence supporting its potential to improve clinical decision-making, risk prediction, and self-management. However, the lived experiences, expectations, and concerns of those involved in its implementation have not been adequatel...
Héctor Martínez-Martínez, Julia Martínez-Alfonso, Belén Sánchez-Rojo-Huertas et al.· Journal of Medical Internet...· 0 citations
With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, growing interest has emerged in its potential application in pediatric healthcare. Understanding the factors influencing AI acceptability among parents and clinical staff is an important prerequisite for facilitating its integration in clinical ro...
F. Lin, A. Bischops, Janna-Lina Kerth et al.· medRxiv· 0 citations
This article shows how the Technology Acceptance Model and Technology Trust are combined in the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) and how the Perceived Empathy Model (PEM) and Perceived Clarity of Accountability Model (PCA) are extensions of these models.
Objective Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming clinical decision‐making. However, patient perspectives on these technologies remain understudied in pediatric care. We investigated patient and parent perspectives on AI use in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) care among a highly engaged cohort. Methods...
Mei-Sing Ong, L. Schanberg, Melanie Kohlheim et al.· ACR Open Rheumatology· 0 citations
OBJECTIVE
To develop and validate the Artificial Intelligence Benefit-Risk Perception Scale (AI-BRPS) for healthcare professionals and explore the associative structure and central nodes of perceived AI benefits and risks.
METHODS
This methodological study generated an initial item pool through literature review, qua...
Hao-Ning Shi, Yue Xiang, Xi-Lin Yang et al.· International Journal of Med...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.