Nancy S. Lind argues that public power now routinely operates through a government–private sector partnership she calls the “hybrid state” and offers a practical framework for judging accountability when decision-making is automated or outsourced, clarifying responsibilities for transparency, due process, and effective oversight.
Abstract
How is American government being reconfigured when public authority is exercised through code, platforms, and data systems as much as through statutes, agencies, and courts? Algorithmic Governance and Power: How AI is Reshaping American Democracy shows how decisions about speech, benefits, policing, immigration, and elections are increasingly shaped by technological infrastructure and private governance operating alongside - and often inside - the state.
Nancy S. Lind argues that public power now routinely operates through a government–private sector partnership she calls the “hybrid state.” Through case-based analysis of algorithmic screening, risk assessment tools, content moderation, and microtargeted political advertising, she traces how legal and policy judgments become embedded in system design - often in ways that are hard to see, contest, or appeal through conventional administrative and judicial channels.
Written for scholars, students, and practitioners navigating a post-Chevron landscape, the book offers a practical framework for judging accountability when decision-making is automated or outsourced, clarifying responsibilities for transparency, due process, and effective oversight.
The growing use of algorithmic systems in public administration is transforming how public decisions are produced, justified, and contested. As automated and data-driven processes become embedded in administrative practice, traditional foundations of administrative authority, including human reasoning, procedural trans...
Duo-Duo Mou· Journal of Law and Governanc...· 0 citations
The study concludes that algorithmic governance should not be understood solely as a threat or an opportunity, but as an ongoing democratic transformation that demands stronger regulation, transparency, digital rights protection, and inclusive governance frameworks.
Deepak Pun Magar, Krishna Prasad Chaudhary· Intellectual Inception: A Mu...· 0 citations
It is argued that public uses of AI should not be evaluated primarily through technical efficiency, ethical compliance, or procedural safeguards, but through democratic legitimacy, and that societies retain the democratic authority to shape, question, supervise, correct, and, when necessary, reject their use.
A. Duche-Pérez, Marco Tulio Falconí Picardo, Emmanuel Neptalí Augusto Chávez Urquizo et al.· Frontiers in Political Scien...· 0 citations
This article examines anti-corruption as a strategic case for understanding the governance of expertise in contemporary policymaking. It asks how anti-corruption governance turns some forms of relevant knowledge into institutionally recognized authority while leaving others peripheral. The article argues that this proc...
Byron Villacis· Frontiers in Political Scien...· 0 citations
Public sector organizations across democratic systems continue to grapple with the persistent gap between policy design and policy outcomes, a challenge that has proven resistant to conventional administrative reform. This review examines how machine learning analytics and evidence-based decision-making are reshaping p...
Akinboyo Samuel Imoleayo, Abdulganiy Olayinka Otesanya, John-Paul Adjadeh· World Journal of Advanced Re...· 0 citations
Public officials and elected politicians are held accountable by various audiences, beyond generally recognized and authorized stakeholders, such as courts and auditors. However, previous studies on felt accountability—that is, individuals’ perception that their actions will be evaluated by salient audiences who may...
A. C. B. de Aquino, F. Domingos, Diana Vaz de Lima· Financial Accountability &am...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.