Skip to content

Algorithmic Governance and Power

Aug 2026 · 0 citations

TL;DR

Nancy S. Lind argues that public power now routinely operates through a government–private sector partnership she calls the “hybrid state” and offers a practical framework for judging accountability when decision-making is automated or outsourced, clarifying responsibilities for transparency, due process, and effective oversight.

Abstract

How is American government being reconfigured when public authority is exercised through code, platforms, and data systems as much as through statutes, agencies, and courts? Algorithmic Governance and Power: How AI is Reshaping American Democracy shows how decisions about speech, benefits, policing, immigration, and elections are increasingly shaped by technological infrastructure and private governance operating alongside - and often inside - the state. Nancy S. Lind argues that public power now routinely operates through a government–private sector partnership she calls the “hybrid state.” Through case-based analysis of algorithmic screening, risk assessment tools, content moderation, and microtargeted political advertising, she traces how legal and policy judgments become embedded in system design - often in ways that are hard to see, contest, or appeal through conventional administrative and judicial channels. Written for scholars, students, and practitioners navigating a post-Chevron landscape, the book offers a practical framework for judging accountability when decision-making is automated or outsourced, clarifying responsibilities for transparency, due process, and effective oversight.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Jul 2026

From Algorithmic Decision-Making to Administrative Legitimacy: Rethinking Legal Accountability in Digital Governance

The growing use of algorithmic systems in public administration is transforming how public decisions are produced, justified, and contested. As automated and data-driven processes become embedded in administrative practice, traditional foundations of administrative authority, including human reasoning, procedural trans...

Duo-Duo Mou · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Algorithmic Governance: Democratic Opportunity or Threat

The study concludes that algorithmic governance should not be understood solely as a threat or an opportunity, but as an ongoing democratic transformation that demands stronger regulation, transparency, digital rights protection, and inclusive governance frameworks.

Deepak Pun Magar, Krishna Prasad Chaudhary · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

From algorithmic efficiency to democratic legitimacy: rethinking AI governance in the Global South

It is argued that public uses of AI should not be evaluated primarily through technical efficiency, ethical compliance, or procedural safeguards, but through democratic legitimacy, and that societies retain the democratic authority to shape, question, supervise, correct, and, when necessary, reject their use.

A. Duche-Pérez, Marco Tulio Falconí Picardo, Emmanuel Neptalí Augusto Chávez Urquizo et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Governing expertise through anti-corruption: how governance mechanisms authorize expertise and ratify power

This article examines anti-corruption as a strategic case for understanding the governance of expertise in contemporary policymaking. It asks how anti-corruption governance turns some forms of relevant knowledge into institutionally recognized authority while leaving others peripheral. The article argues that this proc...

Byron Villacis · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Enhancing policy implementation effectiveness in democratic governance through machine learning analytics and evidence-based decision-making in public sector organizations

Public sector organizations across democratic systems continue to grapple with the persistent gap between policy design and policy outcomes, a challenge that has proven resistant to conventional administrative reform. This review examines how machine learning analytics and evidence-based decision-making are reshaping p...

Akinboyo Samuel Imoleayo, Abdulganiy Olayinka Otesanya, John-Paul Adjadeh · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Beyond Formal Oversight: Contested Issues, Digital Traces, and the Justificatory Consequences of Felt Accountability

Public officials and elected politicians are held accountable by various audiences, beyond generally recognized and authorized stakeholders, such as courts and auditors. However, previous studies on felt accountability—that is, individuals’ perception that their actions will be evaluated by salient audiences who may...

A. C. B. de Aquino, F. Domingos, Diana Vaz de Lima · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.