Skip to content
Review Open access

Functional interplay between TTP/ZFP36 and HuR/ELAVL1 in cancer: a post-transcriptional regulatory network

Jul 2026 · Frontiers in Oncology · Vol 16 · 0 citations · 111 references
Medicine

TL;DR

This review summarizes current knowledge regarding the molecular biology of TTP and HuR, emphasizing their opposing functions in mRNA metabolism and cancer progression; discusses mechanisms regulating their expression, localization, phosphorylation, and RNA-binding activity; analyze cancer-specific evidence; and examines models in which both proteins are co-expressed or functionally interconnected.

Abstract

Post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression has emerged as a fundamental determinant of cancer initiation, progression, and therapeutic response. Among the RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) involved in mRNA turnover and translational regulation, tristetraprolin (TTP), encoded by the ZFP36 gene, and “Human antigen R” (HuR), encoded by ELAVL1, represent two functionally antagonistic regulators of AU-rich element (ARE)-containing transcripts. TTP promotes the degradation of target mRNAs through recruitment of deadenylation and decay complexes, whereas HuR generally stabilizes and enhances the translation of overlapping mRNA subsets. Because many oncogenic, inflammatory, angiogenic, and metastasis-associated transcripts contain AREs within their 3′ untranslated regions, the balance between TTP-mediated decay and HuR-mediated stabilization critically influences tumor biology. Accumulating evidence demonstrates that loss of TTP expression or activity and cytoplasmic accumulation of HuR are recurrent features across multiple cancer types, including breast, colorectal, pancreatic, gastric, liver, ovarian, and lung cancers. Importantly, several studies indicate that the reciprocal interplay between these proteins establishes a post-transcriptional rheostat controlling cancer-associated RNA regulons. This review summarizes current knowledge regarding the molecular biology of TTP and HuR, emphasizing their opposing functions in mRNA metabolism and cancer progression. We discuss mechanisms regulating their expression, localization, phosphorylation, and RNA-binding activity; analyze cancer-specific evidence; and examine models in which both proteins are co-expressed or functionally interconnected. Finally, we evaluate therapeutic strategies aimed at restoring TTP function or inhibiting HuR activity and discuss future perspectives for targeting post-transcriptional regulatory networks in oncology.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

RNA‐Binding Proteins: Function, Biological Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Opportunities

A network‐based framework for exploiting RBPs as therapeutic vulnerabilities and for advancing next‐generation precision oncology is provided, integrating mechanistic principles with translational evidence.

Ling Li, Xiu-Li Yan, Qing Ji et al. · 0 citations
Review Jul 2026

Context-dependent roles of DHX9 in Cancer: Molecular mechanisms, biomarker potential, and therapeutic perspectives.

The molecular characteristics and regulatory properties of DHX9 are summarized, its roles in genome stability, transcriptional and post-transcriptional control, circular RNA biogenesis, and tumor-immune crosstalk are discussed, and its emerging value as a potential biomarker and therapeutic target is evaluated.

Yejin Cai, Ziyuan Chen, Jia-Ying Xiong et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Sensing the needs: Molecular basis of miRNA regulatory role of ELAVL protein HuR.

How post-translational modifications of HuR or its partners affect miRNA activity is discussed, suggesting that HuR serves as a miRNA sensor and linking HuR-related miRNA regulation to human diseases, thereby positioning HuR as a druggable target for controlling miRNA activity and target gene expression.

Kamalika Mukherjee · 1 citation
Review Open access 2026

The Mechanisms Underlying the Aberrant Expression and Oncogenic Role of SNHG1 in Cancer

A mechanism-driven approach is adopted to systematically examine SNHG1 dysregulation and its roles in cancer, which complements existing literature and provides a clear framework for future SNHG1 research.

Hao Zhou, Jian-Lin Zhou, Lin Zhou · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Abstract PR010: Targeted degradation of cyclin T1 constrains transcription elongation and triggers tumour cell apoptosis

Transcriptional dysregulation is a hallmark of cancer and is frequently driven by oncogenic alterations that rewire downstream gene-expression programmes. Although kinase inhibitors targeting upstream oncogenic drivers can produce clinical benefit, responses are often limited by acquired resistance and pathway adapta...

Janice Wenzheng Neng, Laura Blenkarn, Laura S. Itzhaki et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.