Skip to content
Review Open access

From brain scans to classifiers: A systematic review of ML-based autism diagnostic frameworks

Feb 2026 · Digital Health · Vol 12 · 0 citations · 153 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Neuroimaging-based Machine Learning (ML) offers strong potential for improving ASD diagnosis but faces challenges in reproducibility, interpretability, dataset variability, and clinical translation.

Abstract

Background Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a lifelong neurodevelopmental condition affecting social interaction, communication, and behavior, with traditional diagnosis relying on subjective and time-consuming behavioral assessments. Advances in neuroimaging have enhanced understanding of the brain mechanisms underlying ASD. Objective This systematic review aimed to comprehensively examine ASD classification datasets and recent advancements in ASD diagnosis using neuroimaging modalities, and to analyze machine learning techniques for ASD diagnosis to evaluate their diagnostic performance in terms of accuracy and Area Under the Curve (AUC). Methods The review followed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A comprehensive literature search (2021–2025) was conducted across major databases, including Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, ACM, ScienceDirect, MDPI, and Springer. Results Out of 2,329 initially identified records, 825 were screened for eligibility after title and abstract review. The final analysis included 107 studies, which predominantly used structural and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Electroencephalography, and multimodal datasets for ASD classification. The most common classifiers were Convolutional Neural Networks, Support Vector Machines, Random Forests, and hybrid Deep Learning (DL) models. Studies reported performance metrics such as accuracy and AUC, with many showing promising diagnostic results. Key limitations included small sample sizes, lack of external validation, dataset imbalance, and limited generalizability across multi-site datasets. Conclusion Neuroimaging-based Machine Learning (ML) offers strong potential for improving ASD diagnosis but faces challenges in reproducibility, interpretability, dataset variability, and clinical translation. Future work should focus on multi-site validation, explainable AI, and standardized evaluation to ensure reliable, real-world applications.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Data‐Driven Approaches for Autism Detection: A Comprehensive Review of Machine Learning Algorithms and Datasets

The need to develop large, well‐balanced datasets, the application of explainable AI techniques, standardization and regulatory guidelines for facilitating the clinical translation of ASD detection systems are suggested.

Anupama N, Chandrashekar M. Patil · 0 citations
#explainable ai Review Aug 2026

AI and neuroimaging in autism spectrum disorder: advances in diagnosis, methodological challenges and future directions

A comprehensive review of recent advancements in ASD research, with particular emphasis on neuroimaging, artificial intelligence (AI), and machine learning (ML)-based diagnostic approaches, highlights the growing potential of AI-driven tools for supporting early ASD diagnosis and emphasizes the need for standardized protocols, external validation, explainable AI, and clinically translatable frameworks.

Kuljeet Singh, Khushi Mogha, S. Moctar · 0 citations
Review Jul 2026

A Scoping Review of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods for Autism Spectrum Disorder Diagnosis and Analysis.

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a heterogeneous neurodevelopmental condition characterized by diverse behavioral, cognitive, sensory, and communication profiles, making early diagnosis and personalized intervention challenging. Recent advances in machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) have enabled the development of computational tools for ASD screening, classification, severity assessment, and intervention monitoring. This review synthesizes findings from 50 recent studies that applied ML and DL techniques to ASD-related datasets, including electroencephalography (EEG), eye-tracking, behavioral video, microbiome, voice acoustic, demographic, and multimodal data. The review addresses three key questions: (i) which data modalities and computational approaches are most frequently used, (ii) how diagnostic performance is evaluated across different study designs, and (iii) what methodological challenges limit clinical translation. The literature is organized according to data modality, algorithmic approach, and clinical readiness. Approaches examined include conventional ML methods, convolutional neural networks, graph neural networks, hybrid deep learning architectures, federated learning, explainable artificial intelligence, topological data analysis, and multimodal fusion. The findings suggest that multimodal and graph-based approaches provide a more comprehensive representation of ASD phenotypes than single-modality methods. Explainability and privacy-preserving learning have also emerged as important considerations for clinical deployment. However, many reported high-performance models are based on small sample sizes, repeated use of the ABIDE dataset, class imbalance, single-site validation, or limited external testing, raising concerns regarding generalizability. Beyond diagnostic accuracy, this review evaluates model interpretability, calibration, scalability, validation rigor, and clinical applicability. Overall, the analysis highlights the need for standardized benchmarks, externally validated multimodal datasets, clinically relevant evaluation metrics, and decision-support systems that complement rather than replace expert clinical assessment in ASD diagnosis and management.

S. K, Lakshmi Annapurna Y · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Age-stratified multimodal MRI and machine learning to explore autism-related brain characteristics in youth

The findings indicate that multimodal classifiers integrating complementary structural, microstructural, and functional imaging features result in a more comprehensive representation of brain features that strengthens model performance.

Garazi Casillas Martinez, Anthony J. Winder, K. Amador et al. · 0 citations
Conference Jul 2026

Advanced Computational Approaches for Early detection of Autism Spectrum Disorder using Machine and Deep Learning: Recent Trends and Perspective

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurological and developmental condition characterized by challenges in social interaction, communication (both verbal and non-verbal), and repetitive behaviours. While genetics play a key role in its onset, early diagnosis remains essential for effective intervention. Machine learning (ML) offers a promising approach to streamline and accelerate ASD detection, making it faster and more cost-effective than traditional methods. This paper evaluates eight classification models to identify key ASD features and automate diagnosis. We compare their performance on large datasets to enhance predictive accuracy. ML has transformed healthcare by leveraging vast data volumes for analysis, with technological advances over the past decade improving diagnostic tools now standard in medical settings. ASD affects individuals variably, with symptoms typically appearing between 18 months and 3 years. Although genetic and environmental factors contribute, no single cause is confirmed. Traditional screenings rely heavily on clinician expertise, involving manual assessments and scoring, which can be subjective and time-consuming—even experts face uncertainties in predicting onset or severity. Parents seek rapid, reliable results. ML and deep learning (DL) address these gaps by analyzing complex patterns in data, enabling early prediction of ASD and its severity. This study implements diverse algorithms to support precise, automated screening, reducing diagnostic delays and improving outcomes.

Devireddy Mamatha, K. Maheswari · 0 citations
Review Jul 2026

Emerging Approaches for Early Diagnosis of Autism: A Comprehensive Survey of Machine, Deep and Transfer Learning Methods

Based on the evaluated studies, transfer learning with diverse datasets and modalities has great promise for early ASD diagnosis, and a hybrid transfer learning-based framework is advised to assist clinicians and therapists in accurately diagnosing and assessing ASD severity.

R. Thillaikarasi, P. Kumaresan · 0 citations