Preoperative risky eating behaviour is a strong independent predictor of weight loss success after LSG, and early postoperative weight loss further identifies patients at risk of failure.
Abstract
Objective This study examined the association between preoperative parameters and weight loss outcomes at 12 months after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed 93 patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG); the 68 with complete 12-month data formed the analytic cohort. Success was defined as a total weight loss (TWL) of at least 25% at 12 months. Eating behaviour was classified as “healthy” or “risky” using the validated Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire. Logistic regression, ROC analysis, and bootstrap internal validation were used to identify predictors and assess model performance. Results Of the 68 patients in the analytic cohort, 54.4% (n = 37) achieved successful weight loss. Risky eating behaviour was the only independent predictor of lower success (adjusted OR = 0.03, 95% CI: 0.01–0.14, p < 0.001); female sex was not significant after adjustment (OR = 0.40, p = 0.23). The final model (risky eating behaviour, baseline BMI, diabetes) showed an AUC of 0.89 (optimism-corrected 0.88), with sensitivity 86.5%, specificity 80.6%, and accuracy 83.8%. Conclusion Preoperative risky eating behaviour is a strong independent predictor of weight loss success after LSG, and early postoperative weight loss further identifies patients at risk of failure. Identifying patients with risky eating behaviour could help tailor preoperative counselling and postoperative support.
This retrospective cohort study evaluated one-year weight-loss trajectories after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and explored baseline factors associated with postoperative outcomes. Adult patients who underwent surgery between January 2021 and June 2024 were identified from an institutional bariatric surgery database...
Ya-Xuan Wang, Rui Zhao, An-Ming Xu et al.· Updates in Surgery· 1 citation
BACKGROUND
This interim analysis evaluated the safety and efficacy of single anastomosis sleeve-ileal bypass (SASI) versus one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), and determined the optimal sample size for a prospective observational study using propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis. The short- and mid-term findings a...
M. Lirici, B. Pascotto, J. Azagra et al.· MITAT. Minimally invasive th...· 0 citations
BACKGROUND
The optimal bariatric procedure for patients with severe obesity (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2) remains debated. This study compares standard laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) with an emerging metabolic intervention, LSG with proximal jejunal bypass (LSG + PJB).
METHODS
A retroprospective study (January 2022-Decembe...
Sathienrapong Chantawibul, Kwanchanok Losuwarat, Ratchamon Pinyoteppratarn et al.· Asian Journal of Endoscopic...· 0 citations
Adjunctive semaglutide therapy initiated six months after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy was associated with significantly greater long-term weight loss and improved cardiometabolic outcomes compared with surgery alone.
Pamela Jeske, Julia Roleder, Kinga Zastawna et al.· Surgical Endoscopy· 0 citations