Aug 2026· International Journal of Molecular Sciences· Vol 27· 0 citations· 75 references
Medicine
TL;DR
The biological basis of molecular residual disease, liquid biopsy technologies, ctDNA data, the concept of molecular recurrence, and the future prospects of multi-analytic and artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted surveillance models in gastric cancer are summarized.
Abstract
Gastric cancer remains a major cause of cancer mortality worldwide, mainly due to its frequent diagnosis at advanced stages and the high probability of recurrence even after curative treatment. Conventional postoperative follow-up is mainly based on imaging studies, endoscopy and serological tumor markers, such as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), and carbohydrate antigen 72-4 (CA72-4)This narrative review was based on a structured literature search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from database inception through June 2026, with 75 studies included in the final narrative synthesis. Among these analytes, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)currently provides the most mature data for the detection of molecular residual disease and postoperative risk stratification. Although it allows for the early detection of recurrent or residual disease prior to imaging confirmation, postoperative ctDNA has shown significant prognostic value in many studies; however, routine use as a basis for decision-making in treatment planning is still considered investigational and will require future prospective clinical validation. Tumor-informed ctDNA approaches offer high analytical specificity and sensitivity in low-burden disease settings. In contrast, tumor-agnostic approaches, such as methylation analysis and fragmentomics, may improve the scalability of the method. However, they require further validation in the postoperative setting. At the same time, emerging data indicate that extracellular vesicles, exosomal RNA and peritoneal lavage analytes can provide complementary biological information, especially in cases of peritoneal dissemination. Despite the significant prospects, the use of liquid biopsy in guiding the treatment of gastric cancer remains under investigation. This is because even today there are limitations. Characteristic are the low ctDNA excretion and the anatomical heterogeneity of the disease, as well as clonal hematopoiesis. Limitations also include the lack of standardization as well as the cost and the need for prospective clinical studies. This review summarizes the biological basis of molecular residual disease, liquid biopsy technologies, ctDNA data, the concept of molecular recurrence, and the future prospects of multi-analytic and artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted surveillance models in gastric cancer.
Esophageal cancer (EC) remains a highly lethal malignancy, characterized by late diagnosis, early systemic dissemination, and high recurrence rates. Conventional diagnostic and surveillance strategies have limited sensitivity for early disease detection and minimal residual disease. Liquid biopsy technologies have emer...
A. Aiolfi, D. Bona, E. Rausa et al.· Updates in Surgery· 0 citations
Abstract Locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC), defined as FIGO 2018 stages IB3-IVA, is associated with relapse rates between 30 and 60% after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). The current strategy for monitoring is based on physical examinations and imaging, which could be confounded by radiation-induced fibrosis,...
Dilfuza Mirzaeva, Sharodiya Das, Laziz Y. T. O'G'Li et al.· Indian Journal of Medical an...· 0 citations
Background Despite advances in perioperative and neoadjuvant strategies, patients with locally advanced gastroesophageal cancers remain at high risk of recurrence after curative intent treatment. No validated biomarkers are available to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) or to guide post-operative risk-adapted manag...
A. Puccini, L. Paracchini, R. Alfieri et al.· ESMO gastrointestinal oncolo...· 0 citations
Background Stage II colon cancer is clinically heterogeneous. Current clinicopathologic risk factors cannot accurately identify patients with residual disease after curative resection. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising biomarker for the detection of minimal residual disease (MRD), defined as micr...
Er-Hua Yang, Xue-Feng Wang, Jia-Jing Zhang et al.· Frontiers in Oncology· 0 citations
The findings suggest that tumor-informed ctDNA analysis provides a promising approach for post-operative MRD surveillance and recurrence risk stratification in CRC, however, the small sample size, lack of external validation, and absence of neoadjuvant-treated patients preclude definitive conclusions.
William C. Cho, Yingyu Wang, Qian-Qian Yao et al.· Oncology Research· 0 citations
Current professional guidance supports a cautious distinction between clinical validity and clinical utility: ctDNA can inform prognosis, counseling, and clinical-trial eligibility, but should not routinely replace standard surveillance or independently determine treatment escalation or de-escalation outside evidence-b...
H. Al-Shamsi, S. Rafii, S. Tirmazy et al.· OncoTargets and Therapy· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.