This paper describes the system for CLEF 2026 CheckThat!
Abstract
Automated verification of numerical claims is a challenging problem, as it requires both language understanding and quantitative reasoning. This paper describes our system for CLEF 2026 CheckThat! Task 2, which focuses on ranking reasoning traces generated by large language models (LLMs) and predicting a final verdict for numerical claims in English and Arabic. We explore two approaches. The first approach fine-tunes an LLM-based verifier using LoRA to score each reasoning trace independently as a binary classification problem, and selects the final verdict using Best-of-N selection. We further experiment with adaptive sub-claim decomposition to break complex claims into simpler parts before verification. The second approach uses a lightweight TF-IDF reward model with handcrafted numeric and temporal overlap features to score traces, and aggregates scores by verdict group to determine the final prediction. For Arabic, we compare a general multilingual model against AraBERT, a language-specific model pretrained on Arabic text. Our results show that the LLM-based approach outperforms the lightweight reward model on most metrics, particularly Recall@5, while the reward-based approach shows stronger performance on the Conflicting class. Sub-claim decomposition did not improve performance, suggesting that claim splitting introduces noise rather than aiding reasoning. For Arabic, AraBERT outperforms the multilingual baseline across most metrics.
The results indicate that effective multilingual financial reasoning requires language-aware retrieval, model routing, and deliberate scoring strategy selection, and that effective multilingual financial reasoning requires language-aware retrieval, model routing, and deliberate scoring strategy selection.
We present the IGT system for PolyFiQA Task 2 of the FinMMEval Lab at CLEF 2026, a multilingual financial question answering task over English SEC filings and multilingual news articles (English, Chinese, Japanese, Spanish, Greek) for four companies. Our central observation is that the 344 development questions divide...
This work introduces a two-level framework that distills LLM reasoning into an efficient non-generative student and adapts its decision boundary to product-type-specific trade-up criteria.
Si-Liang Liu, Mohammadhasan Ghasemi, Sapan Patel et al.· 0 citations
This work compares Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), and Odds Ratio Preference Optimization (ORPO) using a novel reward modeling approach based on execution and semantic principles, revealing that while standard PPO suffers from reward sparsity and catastrophic collapse on 7B mod...
Noah Hampp, Katya Mirylenka, Michael R. Glass· Swiss Text Analytics Confere...· 1 citation
SOLID is proposed, a novel framework for self-improving OR language models without verified answers or external evaluators that improves solution accuracy for both general-purpose and OR-tuned models over outcome-only group-relative training.
Rui-Chen Zhu, Ming-Long Cao, Chen-Yu Zhou et al.· 0 citations
It is found that, in this benchmark, supervised fine-tuning (SFT) provides a strong baseline, substantially improving argument language consistency and end-to-end function call accuracy and, under consistent model selection, SFT achieves performance comparable to, and sometimes exceeding more complex reinforcement lear...
Siddharth Chauhan, Thomas Butler, Abhishek Singhania et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.