Oct 2026· Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society· 0 citations
TL;DR
An ongoing PhD research project that reframes transparency in AI systems from a property of models to a participatory relation between a system and the people interacting with it, using refineable graph structures grounded in logic and inquisitive semantics.
Abstract
This paper presents an ongoing PhD research project that reframes transparency in AI systems from a property of models to a participatory relation between a system and the people interacting with it. Rather than asking whether a model is interpretable, the project asks what a system and its deployment context must be like for the demands of those interacting with it --- their questions, their need to act, their accountability and governance requirements --- to be genuinely satisfiable. This alignment between system structure and observer demand is formalized as semantic transparency, using refineable graph structures grounded in logic and inquisitive semantics. The framework has been validated in sociotechnical decision processes through close collaboration with public sector organizations on EU AI Act compliance and recruitment AI, producing
formal results and practical tools for accountability and fairness analysis. Ongoing work extends the framework to the causal structure of intentional agency and knowledge formation as mediated through AI systems.
Problem. The rapid deployment of large language models (LLMs) into safety-critical roles, including mental health support, education, and professional guidance, has created a gap between the safety claims AI developers publish and the behaviors their systems exhibit in practice. Current documentation practices, primari...
Kalvin Thuan-phong Khuu· Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE...· 0 citations
Transparency in AI-supported decision systems is widely required but poorly defined. Existing approaches treat transparency as a property of systems or components, producing characteristic failures: assessments that do not transfer across organizational boundaries, stakeholder questions that cannot be formulated within...
Mattias Brännström, T. Xanthopoulou, Li-Li Jiang· 0 citations
This Perspective argues that agentic AI safety should move beyond exclusive reliance on model trust, alignment, or prompt-level defenses and should be treated as a software-architecture problem and developed a five-plane reference topology comprising intent, orchestration, execution, oversight, and adaptation.
Michai Morin, F. Sufi· Frontiers of Computer Scienc...· 0 citations
AI development agents are increasingly used to support and partially automate software architecture tasks. To explore how practitioners perceive this shift, specifically what changes, what remains, and what new responsibilities emerge, we conducted a focus group at the 31st European Conference on Pattern Languages of P...
U. van Heesch, Olaf Zimmermann, Christian Kohls· 1 citation
This paper presents a three-stage inquiry conducted through the Symbiotic Dialogic Development (SDD) methodology a framework of transparent co-authorship between a human researcher and an Al language model. In the first stage, SDD is formalized as a model of iterative human-Al collaboration, where the human functions a...
Agents built on large language models (LLMs) now browse, fill in forms and complete transactions on websites that were designed for people looking at a screen. Existing standards do not describe what such an agent needs from a page. WCAG 2.2 sets requirements for human users of assistive technology, and interoperabilit...
Oluwaseyi Adediran, Odumuyiwa Teslim, Oluwafemi Memuletiwon, Oluwaseun Ogunseitan, Joseph Adewuyi, Alfred Udosen, Opeyemi Adelowo· International Journal of Adv...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.