Skip to content
Open access

An interpretable multimodal biomechanical–radiological model for predicting fixation failure in osteoporotic hip fractures: A retrospective cohort study

Aug 2026 · Medicine · Vol 105, pp. e49988 · 0 citations · 25 references
Medicine

TL;DR

The random forest model demonstrated strong discriminatory ability and calibration in predicting fixation failure in this single-center retrospective cohort, and shows promise for perioperative risk stratification.

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and validate a multimodal prediction model integrating biomechanical and radiological variables to predict internal fixation failure in osteoporotic hip fractures, enabling individualized risk assessment and perioperative decision-making. Patients with osteoporotic hip fractures undergoing internal fixation between March 2019 and February 2024 were retrospectively enrolled and randomly divided into a training set (n = 249) and a validation set (n = 107) at a 7:3 ratio. The primary outcome was implant-related failure within 12 months post-surgery. In the training set, univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed to screen associated factors. Using independent predictors, 3 machine learning models (random forest, support vector machine, and K-nearest neighbors) were developed and compared. The model with the best discriminative ability, assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with internal validation (bootstrapping), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis, was selected to construct a nomogram. No significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed between the training and validation sets (P > .05). Multivariate logistic regression identified that bone mineral density, maximum fracture end displacement, peak stress distribution of the implant, fracture reduction alignment deviation, and implant insertion depth were significantly associated with fixation failure (P < .05). The nomogram demonstrated excellent performance in both the training (AUC = 0.887, 95% confidence interval: 0.835–0.939) and validation sets (AUC = 0.869, 95% confidence interval: 0.801–0.937). Calibration curves showed good agreement between predicted and observed risks (P > .05), and decision curve analysis indicated superior clinical net benefit across a wide threshold range. Stability testing confirmed no significant multicollinearity (variance inflation factor < 2, events per variable ≥ 5). The random forest model demonstrated strong discriminatory ability and calibration in predicting fixation failure in this single-center retrospective cohort. While the model shows promise for perioperative risk stratification, external validation in multicenter prospective studies is required before clinical implementation.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Machine learning, decision tree and nomogram for predicting screw loosening after PLIF in osteoporotic patients: a retrospective multicenter study

To develop and validate machine learning models and an individualized nomogram for predicting pedicle screw loosening after posterior lumbar interbody fusion in osteoporotic patients using preoperative clinical, imaging, and bone metabolism-related medication profiles, these complementary tools offer a potentially usef...

Xue Yu, Wen-Bo Gu, Xiang-Hai Yu et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Risk factors analysis and risk prediction model establishment for heterotopic ossification after open reduction and internal fixation of distal humeral fractures: a retrospective cohort study

Objective To identify independent risk factors for heterotopic ossification (HO) after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of distal humeral fractures, and to construct and validate a clinically applicable risk prediction model. Methods This retrospective cohort study included 826 patients with distal humeral f...

Qiming Liu, Yu-Hai Wang, Zilin Zhang et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Development and validation of a CT-based predictive model for new vertebral compression fractures: the role of vertebral CT attenuation and paraspinal muscle

The nomogram developed based on conventional clinical data in this study, has undergone internal validation and demonstrated efficacy in predicting NVCF following PVP, and serves as a valuable decision-making tool for clinicians.

Yi-Qi Wu, Qing Song, Canwei Hu et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Multivariate Risk Factor Analysis and Clinical Prediction Model Construction of Intercostal Neuralgia Following Single-Segment Osteoporotic Thoracic Vertebral Compression Fractures

Post-fracture intercostal neuralgia in osteoporotic thoracic vertebrae is multifactorial, and middle thoracic vertebra fractures, injury of the thoracolumbar fascia, decreased bone density, intravertebral vacuum fissure, and depressive state are independent risk factors.

Dongliang Xiao, Yong-Guang Xu · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Secondary fragility fractures after hip fracture surgery in four thousand, four hundred and eighteen older adults: risk factors and internal validation of an interpretable machine-learning model

The interpretable XGBoost model showed moderate discrimination and potential clinical utility as an adjunctive screening tool to identify patients who may benefit from intensified secondary prevention.

Shi-Zan He, Di Wu, Da-Jun Jiang et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.