While there is substantial research on weather forecast verification and on user evaluation of forecasts, these approaches are often treated separately. Linking them can enhance forecast credibility, increase trust, and support more effective decision‐making. This study applies a mixed‐methods approach to evaluate severe weather forecasts produced by the Tanzania Meteorological Authority (TMA), from forecast generation to end‐user application. Quantitative verification used satellite‐derived rainfall estimates from the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission to assess forecast skill across lead times and rainfall thresholds. Results show forecast accuracy above 0.80, with probability of detection (POD) of 0.6–0.9 across thresholds, but also a high false alarm ratio (0.4–0.7) and evidence of overforecasting, particularly at longer lead times. Reliance on a single national 50 mm/24 h threshold was a key driver of false alarms and may not reflect area‐specific risks. Qualitative evaluation, based on interviews and participatory observations with disaster risk reduction stakeholders, highlighted that severe weather forecasts reached institutional actors such as the Dar es Salaam Emergency Response Team and the Tanzania Red Cross Society in a timely manner. However, challenges remain in ensuring last mile delivery to communities. Interviewees emphasized the importance of SMS, local radio, trusted intermediaries, and simpler language to improve understanding and uptake. The study recommends revising rainfall thresholds by regions, integrating disaster impact data into verification, and institutionalizing user feedback forums for severe weather forecasts. Limitations include reliance on 1 year of warnings, the absence of geo‐referenced impact datasets, and constraints in polygon vectorization. By combining forecast verification with user evaluation, this study provides a comprehensive assessment of forecast performance and its application in disaster risk reduction, with lessons relevant beyond Tanzania.
A low-cost, uncertainty quantification method is presented that calibrates ensemble forecasts to probabilities of exceedances for rainfall extremes and helps guide forecast adoption for EWS.
S. Nath, David Koros, Fenwick C. Cooper et al.· npj Natural Hazards· 2 citations
Meteorological services face a major challenge in providing reliable snowfall forecasts and detecting solid precipitation, as precise data is needed for weather warnings, damage assessments, hydrological modeling, and many other tasks. This study evaluates the skill of the ALADIN numerical weather prediction model in...
K. Čížková, R. Tolasz, R. Brožková et al.· Weather and forecasting· 0 citations
Precipitation forecasts from numerical weather prediction systems can contain systematic errors in both occurrence and magnitude, limiting their usefulness for hydrological applications. This study evaluated two operational precipitation forecasting systems against two observational reference datasets across three basi...
Violet Ishak, D. Ferreira, Maria Fernanda Dames dos Santos Lima et al.· Hydrology· 0 citations
Farmers rely on weather information to guide crop management; however, outcomes often remain uncertain until harvest. This pilot study evaluated downscaled medium- to seasonal-range forecasts for Austria (2018–2022), focusing on air temperature, precipitation, and six crop-independent agrometeorological indicators (str...
S. Thaler, J. Eitzinger, A. Atencia et al.· Theoretical and Applied Clim...· 0 citations
Drought early warning increasingly relies on high-resolution monitoring, but the skill of daily soil moisture forecasts at lead times of 1–2 weeks driven by real-time meteorological ensembles has rarely been evaluated directly against an operational drought-monitoring framework. The Hydrological Sub-seasonal Forecastin...
Husain Najafi, F. Boeing, S. Thober et al.· Environmental Research Lette...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.