Skip to content

On the road to the metaverse: a multi-stakeholder analysis of the institutionalization and legitimacy of replication-based esports

Jul 2026 · Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal · pp. 1-20 · 0 citations · 62 references

TL;DR

How digital infrastructures reconfigure institutional authority in sport is foregrounded by empirically documenting co-governance in replication-based esports and extending stakeholder theory to conceptualize platform providers as hybrid co-governors and rule-enforcing actors.

Abstract

This study investigates how replication-based esports, in which athletes' real-world physical performances are transferred into virtual environments through the input–output mechanism of meta-sport, reshape stakeholder roles and governance in professional sport. Focusing on road cycling, the study explores the legitimacy of replication-based esports and how virtualization redistributes authority between federations and platform providers. 30 semi-structured interviews were conducted with representatives from nine stakeholder groups (athletes, coaches, teams, federations, sponsors, media, competition organizers, fans and hard-/software providers). The analysis applied Loy's (1968) dimensions of institutionalized sport – organizational, technological, symbolic and educational. Most stakeholders treat meta-sport as a separate discipline. Virtualization increases stakeholder visibility, broadcasting and fan-athlete interaction, while requiring platform-specific hardware, digital literacy and distinct tactical skills. Performance transparency facilitates data-driven scouting but raises concerns about manipulation and integrity. Gender parity appears more achievable in virtual events. Crucially, governance is shifting toward co-governance: federations continue to provide normative legitimacy and sanctioning authority, whereas platform providers exercise infrastructural authority by controlling data capture, calibration, in-competition mechanics and algorithmic validation. This dual model generates both tensions (e.g. anti-cheating enforcement) and synergies (e.g. standardized rules adapted to platform features). The study foregrounds how digital infrastructures reconfigure institutional authority in sport by empirically documenting co-governance in replication-based esports and extending stakeholder theory to conceptualize platform providers as hybrid co-governors and rule-enforcing actors. Findings contribute to debates on institutionalization and governance in sport management and to the emergent literature on metaverse-based sport.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

The micro-level action logic of boundary spanners in grassroots governance: a systematic review of role dilemmas, brokerage strategies, and contextual consequences

Structural evolution within grassroots governance has reshaped the public policy implementation arena, yielding highly permeable boundaries between the state and society. Operating at the nexus of the bureaucracy and civic networks, boundary spanners serve as vital hubs that connect macro-level institutions with micro-...

Man Tat Ku, Wai-In Ho · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Two-Way Embedding and Resilience Building: The Driving Forces, Effects, and Adaptive Pathways of “Platform-Based Campus Governance”

Social media platforms have redrawn the terrain of university governance in China. Students embed themselves in the governance ecosystem through these platforms, and their strategies have moved well beyond individual rights advocacy toward participation in public affairs. University authorities, for their part, have be...

Ming Qi · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

When institutions, technologies, and platforms co-evolve: a triadic co-evolutionary framework for public health governance in regulated digital service industries

How do institutional constraints, technological embeddedness, and platform governance co-evolve to reconfigure the public health governance of regulated digital service industries? This article develops a triadic co-evolutionary framework—the ITP model—that integrates institutional theory, technological evolution theor...

Yiding Xiao, Zirui Liao, Hailin Zhang · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Exploring the Landscape of University–Industry Partnerships and Boundary-Spanning in South Africa’s Socially and Economically Sustainable Knowledge Economy

University–industry partnerships (UIPs) play a critical role in strengthening innovation systems and socioeconomic development, yet evidence on how these partnerships have evolved in post-apartheid South Africa remains fragmented. This qualitative systematic literature review synthesises four decades of research on Sou...

Nompumelelo Kitty Hellen Mthabela, N. Tshikovhi · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Digital Stakeholder Engagement in The Governance of Pesantren-Based Madrasah: Reinforcing Pesantren Values in The Digital Era

This study aims to analyze how digital media mediates stakeholder relations in the governance of MA Mahrusiyah Lirboyo, Kediri City, as a pesantren-based madrasah. This qualitative field study employed interviews, observations, and documentation involving the principal, public relations vice principal, pesantren admini...

U. Fita, Nanda Rivat Cahya Dinulloh, Muhammad Yasin · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.