Skip to content
Book Open access

Hot off the Press: Runtime Analysis of Evolutionary Diversity Optimization on the Multi-objective (LeadingOnes, TrailingZeros) Problem

Jul 2026 · GECCO Companion · pp. 39-40 · 0 citations · 14 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

EDO is analyzed on a three-objective function LOTZk, which is a modification of the two-objective benchmark function (LeadingOnes, TrailingZeros), and it is proved that the GSEMO computes a set of all Pareto-optimal solutions in O(kn3) expected iterations.

Abstract

Diversity optimization is the class of optimization problems in which we aim to find a diverse set of good solutions. One of the frequently-used approaches to solve such problems is evolutionary diversity optimization (EDO). In this paper, we analyze EDO on a three-objective function LOTZk, which is a modification of the two-objective benchmark function (LeadingOnes, TrailingZeros). We prove that the GSEMO computes a set of all Pareto-optimal solutions in O(kn3) expected iterations. We also analyze the runtime of the GSEMOD algorithm (a modification of the GSEMO for diversity optimization) until it finds a population with the best possible diversity for two different diversity measures: the total imbalance and the sorted imbalances vector. For the first measure we show that the GSEMOD optimizes it in O(kn2 log(n)) expected iterations (which is asymptotically faster than the upper bound on the runtime until it finds a Pareto-optimal population), and for the second measure we show an upper bound of O(k2n3 log(n)) expected iterations. The complementary empirical study shows a very similar behavior for both diversity measures. The results of experiments suggest that our bounds for the total imbalance measure are tight, while the bounds for the imbalances vector are too pessimistic. This paper summarizes the work Denis Antipov, Aneta Neumann, Frank Neumann and Andrew M. Sutton: Runtime Analysis of Evolutionary Diversity Optimization on the Multi-objective (LeadingOnes, TrailingZeros) Problem. Evolutionary Computation, 1–23, 2025. [2].

Read PDF

Similar papers

Jul 2026

Provable Speedups From Dynamic Population Sizes in Evolutionary Algorithms for Multiobjective Optimization

This paper introduces the bi-objective problem class CLIMB and analyzes the runtime of GSEMO and the widely used NSGA-II on this problem, and proves that GSEMO and NSGA-II-DYN, a version of NSGA-II with dynamic population sizes, can find the Pareto front of CLIMB in expected fitness evaluations.

Andre Opris · 0 citations
Conference Open access Sep 2026

Theoretical Analysis of Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms on Integer Spaces with Local Optima

Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) are popular tools for multi-objective optimization (MOO), and have been successfully applied to many real-world MOO problems. However, the theoretical study has lagged behind their practical success and remains largely confined to synthetic pseudo-Boolean functions. To cl...

Yue-Tong Sun, Zeqiong Lv, Sheng-Jie Ren et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

A Comparative Study of Metaheuristics on Raspberry Pi 5: Results to Guide Optimization on Constrained Edge Devices

Overall, the evidence indicates that GWO is the most efficient choice for edge deployment on Raspberry Pi 5, striking a favorable balance between convergence speed, stability, and resource usage.

Ziadan Qowi, Akhdan Musyaffa Firdaus, Hari Purnama · 0 citations
Jul 2026

MLDGWO: a grey wolf optimizer with momentum, leader adjustment, and differential perturbation for global optimization problems

Applied to five engineering optimization problems, modified momentum–leader–differential grey wolf optimizer consistently achieves the lowest objective values, while analytically proving its ability to navigate heavily penalized boundaries and satisfy all constraints.

Xin Su, Yichen Liu · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

A general hybrid framework for many-objective optimization: integrating local search into reference-vector-based evolutionary algorithms

Results show that integrating local search significantly enhances performance, while a principled method for setting hybrid parameters ensures robustness and reproducibility, highlighting the potential of combining mathematical programming techniques with evolutionary algorithms for high-dimensional many-objective opti...

Regina C. L. C. de Sousa, Dênis E. C. Vargas, Elizabeth F. Wanner et al. · 0 citations
Conference Open access Sep 2026

One for Exploration and Another for Exploitation: A Dual-Population MOEA Framework with Provable Benefits

Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs) are currently the most popular tool for solving multi-objective optimization problems. Balancing exploration and exploitation is fundamental to the performance of Multi-Objective EAs (MOEAs). Achieving this requires maintaining a set of high-quality solutions for effective exploitation whi...

Cheng-Lin Jiang, Sheng-Jie Ren, Zi-Min Liang et al. · 3 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.