Skip to content
Review Open access

Canada’s Ministerial Order for Reliance on decisions by foreign regulatory agencies for certain drugs: will it benefit pediatric patients?

Oct 2026 · Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences · 0 citations · 36 references

TL;DR

Reviews of literature, media publications, guidance documents, government, particularly regulatory documents and product information were conducted to explore Canada’s historical record of pediatric approvals with comparison to US and EU and provide recommendations to ensure the amended policy and new guidance will be enabling to achieve the desired outcomes.

Abstract

The lack of pediatric indications and age-appropriate formulations in Canada has been a major concern for the pediatric community for decades. Although small patient populations and onerous approval processes may deter drug manufacturers from developing or marketing these drugs and formulations, the lack of adequate incentives may also contribute to the problem. In July, 2026, Canada issued a Ministerial Order allowing certain drugs to be approved by relying on reviews conducted by foreign regulatory agencies, with pediatric drugs selected as the first pilot category. Reviews of literature, media publications, guidance documents, government, particularly regulatory documents and product information were conducted to explore Canada’s historical record of pediatric approvals with comparison to US and EU. Problems associated with lack of pediatric medications in Canada were identified. The Ministerial Order of Reliance together with the guidance document were examined to determine whether the proposed reform will solve the pediatric medication crisis in Canada. The Reliance Order may help to alleviate some regulatory nuance and speed up approval times, however, is this sufficient to compel sponsors to submit with no mandatory requirements or added incentives under the current proposal. The submission fee and labour involved probably will outweigh commercial return in most cases, thus not an attractive option for sponsors, leading to unsuccessful outcomes. The manuscript attempts to identify gaps and provide recommendations to ensure the amended policy and new guidance will be enabling to achieve the desired outcomes.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

Comparative Study of Regulatory Requirement and Approval Process for Drugs in India, US and Europe

This review conducts a comparative analysis of drug approval for new and generic medicines across three jurisdictions: United States (US FDA), India (CDSCO), and the European Union (EMA) framed as a three-stage process (application, review, approval) and focusing on regulatory pathways, statutory timelines, documentati...

Suchita Anand Shirole, Syed Shoaib Ali · 0 citations
Review Oct 2026

AVAILABILITY OF MEDICINES FOR CHILDREN: ISSUES OF REGULATORY IMPROVEMENT

Objective: to analyze the factors limiting the availability of medicines for children and to substantiate directions for regulatory improvement in the Russian Federation. Materials and methods: a narrative (targeted) review of WHO documents, legal and regulatory acts of the EU, USA, China, Russia and the EAEU, as well...

N. Musina, A. Rumyantsev · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Expanding Patient Access to Innovative Drugs in Canada

Canada has an opportunity to learn from best practices in other jurisdictions to streamline reimbursement pathways and provide earlier, equitable access to new therapies for a greater number of patients, including specific access challenges associated with new dermatological treatments.

Maxwell Sauder, M. Ponzo · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Orphan drug regulation: a global comparison of the United States Food and Drug Administration, European Medicines Agency, and Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency approaches.

A comparative review of orphan drug policies and designation criteria implemented by the US Food and Drug Administration, the European Medicines Agency, and Japan's Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency is performed, assessing their influence on development, approval, and access.

R. Elango, Russell Martin, S. Mutta · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Operationalization of the African Medicines Agency: Retrospective evaluation of the continental centralized pilot procedure timelines to recommendation and national registrations.

AIMS Regulatory inconsistency across Africa causes duplicative assessments, prolonged approvals, and delayed medical access. To inform the African Medicines Agency (AMA), the African Medicines Regulatory Harmonisation (AMRH) piloted Africa's first continental scientific evaluation of human medicinal products. This stud...

Alex Juma Ismail, L. Moeti, D. Darko et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.