Skip to content
Open access

A large-scale pipeline for LLM-assisted corpus annotation

Oct 2025 · International Journal of Corpus Linguistics · 1 citation · 56 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This work presents a scalable pipeline for automating grammatical annotation using large language models (LLMs), and demonstrates the pipeline’s accessibility and effectiveness through a diachronic case study of variation in the English evaluative consider construction.

Abstract

As natural language corpora expand at an unprecedented rate, manual annotation remains a significant methodological bottleneck in corpus linguistic work. We address this challenge by presenting a scalable pipeline for automating grammatical annotation using large language models (LLMs). We demonstrate the pipeline’s accessibility and effectiveness through a diachronic case study of variation in the English evaluative consider construction ( consider X as / to be /Ø Y). We annotate 143,933 ‘consider’ concordance lines from the Corpus of Historical American English (COHA) via the OpenAI API in under 60 hours, achieving 98%+ accuracy on two sophisticated annotation procedures. Subsequent analysis reveals previously undocumented genre-specific trajectories of change, enabling us to advance new hypotheses about the relationship between register formality and competing pressures of morphosyntactic reduction and enhancement. Our results suggest that LLMs can perform a range of data preparation tasks at scale with minimal human intervention, unlocking substantive research questions previously beyond practical reach.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Oct 2026

PromptAlign: Automatic Iterative Alignment of a Large Language Model to Expert Annotations without Fine-Tuning

Large language models are increasingly used in social and psychological sciences; however, their predictions are systematically biased relative to expert annotations (alignment shift), and attempts to manually refine instructions or to supply examples lead to a “blanket-pulling” effect – degradation of minority classes...

Alexander Alekseevich Agathonov, Akhat Rustemovich Khusainov, N. Prokopyev · 0 citations
#natural language process... Open access Oct 2026

Large Language Models for Machine Translation Quality Annotation: Humans and Models Are Both Challenged

Large Language Models (LLMs) are considered to be a more efficient and cost-effective alternative to human judgment for Machine Translation (MT) evaluation. With MT evaluation spanning a large number of language pairs, domains and levels of annotation granularity, LLMs must be thoroughly evaluated across these dimensio...

Hala Almaghout, C. Federmann, Qin Gao · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Evaluating UDPipe 2 and Stanza for Morphosyntactic Annotation of Late Latin: A Pilot Study on Sixth-Century Texts

To date, annotated Late Latin treebanks and natural language processing (NLP) models specifically trained on this linguistic variety remain extremely limited. In this low-resource setting, the present study investigates which combination of annotation tool and model currently available for Latin provides the most relia...

Annachiara Clementelli · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Building open access, calibrated, syntactically annotated corpora over the history of French: A Case study of the application and adaptation of annotation tools for historical syntax

This case study presents challenges and solutions for building calibrated syntactically annotated diachronic corpora of French. Through a series of integrated projects that developed methods for syntactic annotation of medium and large collections of non-literary texts over a long period of time (13th – 19th centuries)...

Pierre Larrivée, N. Romanova, Mathieu Goux et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Nov 2026

Who is the Pronoun Pro? Comparing LLMs and Humans at Number-Disambiguation of'they'

This study evaluates whether large language models (LLMs) can reliably replace or complement human research assistants in linguistically complex annotation. In a controlled annotation task, 73 human annotators (local students and crowdworkers with and without a background in linguistics) and more than 40 LLM configurat...

Carl Hartmann · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.