Oct 2025· International Journal of Corpus Linguistics· 1 citation· 56 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
This work presents a scalable pipeline for automating grammatical annotation using large language models (LLMs), and demonstrates the pipeline’s accessibility and effectiveness through a diachronic case study of variation in the English evaluative consider construction.
Abstract
As natural language corpora expand at an unprecedented rate, manual
annotation remains a significant methodological bottleneck in corpus linguistic work. We
address this challenge by presenting a scalable pipeline for automating grammatical
annotation using large language models (LLMs). We demonstrate the pipeline’s accessibility
and effectiveness through a diachronic case study of variation in the English evaluative
consider
construction (
consider
X
as
/
to be
/Ø Y). We annotate 143,933 ‘consider’
concordance lines from the Corpus of Historical American English (COHA) via the OpenAI API
in under 60 hours, achieving 98%+ accuracy on two sophisticated annotation procedures.
Subsequent analysis reveals previously undocumented genre-specific trajectories of change,
enabling us to advance new hypotheses about the relationship between register formality
and competing pressures of morphosyntactic reduction and enhancement. Our results suggest
that LLMs can perform a range of data preparation tasks at scale with minimal human
intervention, unlocking substantive research questions previously beyond practical
reach.
Large language models are increasingly used in social and psychological sciences; however, their predictions are systematically biased relative to expert annotations (alignment shift), and attempts to manually refine instructions or to supply examples lead to a “blanket-pulling” effect – degradation of minority classes...
Alexander Alekseevich Agathonov, Akhat Rustemovich Khusainov, N. Prokopyev· Russian Digital Libraries Jo...· 0 citations
It is suggested that LLMs can serve as auxiliary annotators for sensitive-language detection in historical materials, provided that human oversight and contextual interpretation remain central to annotation workflows.
Ya-Hui Zhao, Clemencia Siro, L. Hollink et al.· 0 citations
Large Language Models (LLMs) are considered to be a more efficient and cost-effective alternative to human judgment for Machine Translation (MT) evaluation. With MT evaluation spanning a large number of language pairs, domains and levels of annotation granularity, LLMs must be thoroughly evaluated across these dimensio...
Hala Almaghout, C. Federmann, Qin Gao· Conference on Empirical Meth...· 0 citations
To date, annotated Late Latin treebanks and natural language processing (NLP) models specifically trained on this linguistic variety remain extremely limited. In this low-resource setting, the present study investigates which combination of annotation tool and model currently available for Latin provides the most relia...
Annachiara Clementelli· Journal of Open Humanities D...· 0 citations
This case study presents challenges and solutions for building calibrated syntactically annotated diachronic corpora of French. Through a series of integrated projects that developed methods for syntactic annotation of medium and large collections of non-literary texts over a long period of time (13th – 19th centuries)...
Pierre Larrivée, N. Romanova, Mathieu Goux et al.· Digital Humanities Quarterly· 0 citations
This study evaluates whether large language models (LLMs) can reliably replace or complement human research assistants in linguistically complex annotation. In a controlled annotation task, 73 human annotators (local students and crowdworkers with and without a background in linguistics) and more than 40 LLM configurat...
Carl Hartmann· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.