Skip to content
Open access

A Multi-Layer AI Governance Framework for Enhancing Fraud Detection and Integrity Assurance in Large-Scale Organisational Systems

Jul 2026 · Journal of Intelligent Decision Making and Information Science · Vol 3, pp. 928-950 · 0 citations · 44 references

TL;DR

A multi-layer AI governance framework integrating technical, organizational, and controlling oversight to strengthen fraud detection and integrity assurance in large organizations is proposed and demonstrates scalable and sustainable performance.

Abstract

Large organizations progressively adopt artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance fraud detection and ensure integrity across financial, operational, and digital systems. Despite its benefits, AI introduces challenges including data integrity risks, bias, clarity issues, and accountability gaps. Weak governance can lead to false alerts, model drift, and system vulnerabilities. This research proposes a multi-layer AI governance framework integrating technical, organizational, and controlling oversight to strengthen fraud detection and integrity assurance. The technical layer implements anomaly detection, machine learning, and explainable AI (XAI) models. The organizational layer sets up policies, accountability structures, and increase protocols, while the regulatory layer ensures compliance with GDPR, ISO standards, and AI-specific regulations. The framework adherence interoperability across layers, real-time monitoring, and adaptive responses to progressing fraud patterns. By combining ethical, procedural, and technical safeguards, the study offers a practical, scalable model that improves discovery accuracy, reduces false positives, and enhances organizational resilience and trust in AI systems. This study presents a multi-layer AI management framework that enhances fraud detection and uprightness assurance in large organizations. The framework combines technical, organizational, and regulatory layers to strengthen anomaly identification, audit completeness, and governance maturity. Adaptive thresholds and advanced AI techniques allow real-time detection with decreased alert fatigue, while blockchain and confederated learning ensure robust data integrity. Despite working challenges such as data imbalance, system latency, and explainability concerns, the framework demonstrates scalable and sustainable performance. The study offers actionable insights for policy formulation, stakeholder training, and ethical AI adoption, supporting resilient, accountable, and responsible organizational systems.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

AUDITING ARTIFICAL INTELLIGENCE

A comprehensive and risk-based AI audit methodology that integrates governance, data security, model security, and application security dimensions into a unified control framework is proposed, offering organizations a robust tool to manage emerging AI-related risks effectively.

Osman Turan, Z. Müftüoğlu, Tolga Özbilge · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

AI governance under threat managing data poisoning, drift, and integrity challenges

An integrated governance perspective that connects technical AI risks with organisational governance and practical implementation considerations is provided, and an Integrated AI Governance Framework that brings together technical assurance, organisational governance, and internationally recognised governance principle...

U. Shanmugam, Mohan K. Rajendran, Jawahar Natarajan et al. · 0 citations
#federated learning Review Open access Sep 2026

AI Governance Frameworks for Privacy-Preserving Intelligent Systems: Integrating Trust, Compliance, and Secure Data Architectures

The analysis suggests that governance frameworks succeed when privacy-preserving technologies are embedded into system architecture from the outset rather than added afterward, when compliance obligations are translated into measurable technical requirements, and when trust is treated as an emergent property of verifia...

Hamed Taherdoost · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Artificial Intelligence - Model Context Protocol - Review of Real-World Security Threats

The findings demonstrate that safeguarding agentic AI frameworks require multi-layered technical controls, zero-trust architecture, automated schema validation, and strict identity governance, rather than reliance on static boundary controls.

Upendra Kanuru, Alexa Schmitt · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Engineering Decision-Grade Intelligence: Designing Preventive Validation Systems for Public-Funded Institutions

Public-funded institutions operate under increasing pressure to demonstrate accountability, transparency, and measurable impact. Despite the widespread collection of programmatic and financial data, many institutions lack formally engineered systems that ensure information used in funding, compliance, and strategic dec...

Odinaka-olisa James Okonkwo · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

AI-Driven Threat Intelligence for National Cybersecurity Governance: A Framework for Adaptive Risk Detection and Policy-Aware Response

An AI-driven threat intelligence framework designed to enhance national cybersecurity governance through adaptive risk detection, contextual analysis, and policy-aware response orchestration is proposed, demonstrating how AI can support strategic cyber resilience while preserving transparency and policy compliance.

M. M. Salem · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.