Sep 2026· Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology· 0 citations
Medicine
TL;DR
It is suggested that those with an advanced adenomas on index exam continue to have a statistically significant increased risk of advanced neoplasia on 3rd surveillance, and this finding supports close surveillance in patients with these lesions.
Abstract
Background
Due to a lack of data, the USMTSF does not provide guidance for the 3rd surveillance exam for adenomas detected on index colonoscopy. Our aim was to assess advanced outcome risk at 3rd surveillance in patients with index adenomas.
Methods
We included patients from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry with no genetic syndromes, inflammatory bowel disease, those with first degree relative with CRC < 50 years of age, adequate bowel preparation and no colorectal cancer (CRC) on index, and with three follow-up colonoscopies each >12 months apart. Only patients with normal or low risk findings (1-2 small TAs/SSPs) on 1st and 2nd surveillance exam were included. Individuals were stratified by index adenomas: no adenomas, 1-2 non-advanced adenomas (NAA), 3-4 NAA, 5+NAA and advanced adenomas. A Poisson model adjusting for age, sex, index serrated polyps, endoscopist adenoma detection rates and months to follow up exam (offset variable) predicting advanced neoplasia on 3rd surveillance was performed.
Results
Patients (n=1021) with an advanced adenomas on index were found to have a statistically significant increased risk of advanced neoplasia on 3rd surveillance as compared to those patients with no adenomas (adjusted rate ratio=3.96(95%CI:1.96-7.98)). In addition, after adjusting for endoscopists ADRs, the RR was still statistically higher for this group (RR=3.00(95%CI:1.20-7.48)).
Conclusion
Our data suggest that those with an advanced adenomas on index exam continue to have a statistically significant increased risk of advanced neoplasia on 3rd surveillance. This finding supports close surveillance in patients with these lesions.
BACKGROUND
More evidence is needed to inform recommendations for intervals of colonoscopy surveillance after polyp removal.
METHODS
In this ongoing noninferiority trial conducted in eight European countries, we randomly assigned patients with high-risk adenomas (defined as ≥1 adenoma with a diameter of ≥10 mm, high-g...
R. Jover, M. Bretthauer, Joaquín Cubiella et al.· New England Journal of Medic...· 0 citations
BACKGROUND
The adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a key quality metric in colonoscopy. However, it may not accurately reflect the true number of adenomas and requires pathological evaluation of all detected polyps. The adenoma miss rate (AMR), which quantifies adenomas missed during colonoscopy, may provide a more compreh...
Yue-Sheng Li, Weijian Lun· Advances in Clinical and Exp...· 0 citations
Objectives: Postpolypectomy surveillance plays an important role in the prevention of colorectal cancer. However, optimal surveillance intervals for individuals with multiple prior colonoscopies remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the association between prior colonoscopy frequency and advanced neoplasia detec...
T. Kawamura, Yasushi Oda, Go Horiguchi et al.· Journal of the Anus Rectum a...· 0 citations
Importance Colorectal adenomas (CRAs) are the primary precancerous lesions in the development of colorectal cancer; establishing a simple, cost-effective and non-invasive tool for distinguishing adenomatous from non-neoplastic polyps in patients already scheduled for or undergoing endoscopy is of great significance for...
Hao-Ming Yu, Zong-Yu Qiu, Wen-Yao Sui et al.· Frontiers in Oncology· 0 citations
It is demonstrated that colorectal neoplasia may be detected at a young age in patients with LFS, including within a relatively short interval after a negative colonoscopic examination, which underscores the importance of careful and regular colonoscopic surveillance in this high-risk population.
Akihiro Takagi, M. Tajika, Makoto Hori et al.· Clinical Journal of Gastroen...· 0 citations
9Objective To characterise age-related gradients in colorectal lesion severity and prespecified high-risk endoscopic features in a lesion-confirmed screening colonoscopy cohort and to evaluate an investigator-defined red-flag composite as an exploratory marker of advanced pathology. Helicobacter pylori was assessed as...
Li-Na Du, Jing-Zhi Su, Ji-Hua Dai et al.· Frontiers in Oncology· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.