Jul 2026· Studia Prawnicze. Rozprawy i Materiały / Studies in Law: Research Papers· 0 citations· 21 references
TL;DR
This paper aims to evaluate the impact of AI on fundamental rights in private-sector recruitment and selection processes, examining how Portuguese and European legal frameworks can protect candidates.
Abstract
In recent years, Artificial Intelligence has gained prominence in the business sector by allowing companies to focus on their core activities while automating routine and administrative tasks. However, the excessive autonomy and lack of transparency in certain AI systems can negatively impact the fundamental rights of individuals interacting with them. A notable example is the use of AI in recruitment processes, where algorithms screen candidates for job vacancies. Poorly managed implementation may increase the risk of discriminatory outcomes. This paper aims to evaluate the impact of AI on fundamental rights in private-sector recruitment and selection processes, examining how Portuguese and European legal frameworks can protect candidates. Although both Portuguese Constitutional Law and European Law uphold the principle of non-discrimination, they are currently insufficient to address algorithmic bias. In this context, the European legislator’s adoption of the AI Act, designed to limit the potential discriminatory effects of algorithms, is particularly commendable. In order to achieve the proposed objectives, the scientific methodology adopted in this scientific paper was a critical analysis of the state of the question, with an analytical review of the literature and doctrinal works of various authors that we have chosen for this research, and an analysis of the current Portuguese Law and European Union Law, including the current Artificial Intelligence Act, in order to draw the obvious conclusions.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming employment relationships through automation, algorithmic management, automated decision-making, and workplace surveillance. While these technologies offer opportunities for productivity gains and organizational efficiency, they also generate significant challenges fo...
The intersection between AI and antitrust law is explored, analysing whether AI can be used to facilitate anti-competitive practices and to what extent algorithm-driven pricing mechanisms act autonomously and to what degree they may be intentionally influenced or optimized to benefit corporate interests.
Policy recommendations highlight the need for investment in workforce development, strengthened labour protections, ethical guidelines for algorithmic use, and the promotion of social dialogue between employers, workers, and policymakers to balance efficiency with fairness.
Festus Usifo· IIARD International Journal...· 0 citations
A framework for responsible AI deployment consisting of six components: defining purpose and risk levels; data governance; relevance and fairness assessment; ensuring human oversight and decision-making; transparency and review; and continuous monitoring and capacity building is proposed.
H. Nguyen· International Journal of Sci...· 0 citations
It is determined that Ukraine does not have a specialized legal framework for regulating such processes, while the EU is developing relevant standards which guarantee the transparency of algorithms, the protection of employees’ rights, and the ethical use of digital technologies.
О. Lutsenko, O. Sereda, Georgii Zhelef et al.· 0 citations
Pakistan should adopt AI gradually, beginning with administrative and low-risk functions, while preserving the judge as the final constitutional decision-maker, through a doctrinal, analytical and comparative legal approach.
M. Azhar, Naeem Ullah Khan· Journal of Law & Social...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.