Oct 2026· Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention· Vol 27 10, pp.
3637-3643
· 0 citations· 20 references
Medicine
TL;DR
The high upgrade and malignancy rates in this high-risk cohort suggest that BI-RADS 3 lesions with larger size or multiple foci, particularly in breast cancer survivors, may warrant earlier biopsy to detect malignancy, thereby emphasizing the need for refined surveillance criteria.
Abstract
Objective
BI-RADS category 3 lesions are typically benign (<2% malignancy risk), managed with follow-up imaging, but their upgrade to BI-RADS 4 may indicate malignancy, particularly in high-risk patients. This study evaluates malignancy risk and predictors among BI-RADS 3 lesions upgraded to BI-RADS 4 in a cohort with a high prevalence of breast cancer history.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed 352 patients undergoing breast ultrasound from June 2021 to June 2023, with 123 categorized as BI-RADS 3. Of these, 17 patients (18 lesions) were upgraded to BI-RADS 4 and biopsied. Data included age, prior breast cancer history (100/123, 81.3%), lesion characteristics (size, number, morphology), and histopathology. Descriptive statistics, binomial tests, Fisher's exact tests, and logistic regression were used to assess upgrade rates, malignancy rates, and predictors, with significance at p=0.05.
RESULT
The upgrade rate was 13.8% (17/123; 95% CI: 8.5-21.0%), significantly exceeding the ACR's <2% benchmark (p=0.05). Among upgraded lesions, 11.1% (2/18; 95% CI: 1.4-34.7%) were malignant (recurrent breast cancer, lymphomatous lymph node), also surpassing the <2% benchmark (p=0.05). Benign outcomes mainly included stromal fibrosis (38.9%) followed by benign lymphadenopathy (27.8%), and fibroadenoma (22.2%). Lesion size (OR=1.15 per mm, p=0.05) and multiple lesions (OR=3.2, p=0.05) predicted malignancy, while age, cancer history, and morphology were not significant (p>0.05).
Conclusion
The high upgrade and malignancy rates in this high-risk cohort suggest that BI-RADS 3 lesions with larger size or multiple foci, particularly in breast cancer survivors, may warrant earlier biopsy to detect malignancy, thereby emphasizing the need for refined surveillance criteria.
To determine the prevalence of malignancy of additional ultrasound BI-RADS category 3 lesions in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Between July 2014 and June 2022, women with newly diagnosed breast cancer and additional ultrasound BI-RADS 3 lesions were retrospectively included. Malignancy was confirmed by path...
Yue Hu, Hong-Li Wang, Meng-Zi Wu et al.· Insights into Imaging· 0 citations
Aim: Previous studies have largely focused on delays and non-adherence among patients assigned BI-RADS 0 on mammography. However, data describing diagnostic outcomes among patients who return for supplemental imaging (SI), particularly in tertiary care settings, remain limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate fol...
Murat Kaya, Osman Konukoğlu, B. Arslan· Genel Tip Dergisi· 0 citations
BI-RADS category 4 breast lesions are suspicious and generally undergo tissue diagnosis, but malignancy risk remains heterogeneous across BI-RADS 4A, 4B, and 4C. We developed and internally validated an interpretable mammography-based model for risk stratification within this diagnostic category.
This single...
Yan Zhang, Nan Ding, Ting-Ting Jiao et al.· Frontiers in Oncology· 0 citations
Purpose To evaluate the prevalence, upgrade rate, and radiologic surveillance management of high-risk lesions (HRLs) detected at screening mammography in a Dutch breast cancer screening population. Materials and Methods This retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database included patients recalled from t...
Eline L. van der Veer, A. Bluekens, A. Coolen et al.· Radiology: Imaging Cancer· 0 citations
Adult-derived BI-RADS malignancy estimates may overestimate malignancy risk in pediatric breast lesions and contribute to unnecessary procedures. Pediatric breast cancer is exceedingly rare, yet BI-RADS malignancy estimates, developed for adults, are frequently applied to pediatric patients despite lacking validation....
C. Morales, Brittany M. Rizo, Monique Motta et al.· The American surgeon· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.