UAV-MAS is proposed, a training-free multi-agent system for MLLM-based UAV aerial image understanding and reasoning, comprising a Domain-Specific Perception Engine that routes queries to task-appropriate visual tools, a Context-Aware Iterative Refinement module (CAIR) that validates intermediate reasoning to curb error accumulation, and a Difficulty-Aware Adaptive Search mechanism (DAAS) that adjusts search depth to question difficulty.
Abstract
Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM)-based UAV aerial image understanding and reasoning is essential for aerial intelligence yet poses distinct challenges arising from extreme scale variation, arbitrary camera orientations, and high object density. Despite growing interest, existing evaluations remain fragmented across individual datasets and narrow tasks, leaving a critical gap in unified assessment of UAV understanding and reasoning capabilities. To fill this gap, we construct UAVQA-Bench, a benchmark of 1,500 human-annotated QA pairs drawn from 13 public UAV datasets, covering 6 capability dimensions and 16 tasks in both multiple-choice and visual grounding formats. Systematic evaluation of a broad range of open-source and closed-source MLLMs as well as agent-based systems on UAVQA-Bench identifies three key failure modes: domain-toolset mismatch, unchecked error propagation, and static reasoning. Motivated by these findings, we propose UAV-MAS, a training-free multi-agent system for MLLM-based UAV aerial image understanding and reasoning, comprising a Domain-Specific Perception Engine (DSPE) that routes queries to task-appropriate visual tools, a Context-Aware Iterative Refinement module (CAIR) that validates intermediate reasoning to curb error accumulation, and a Difficulty-Aware Adaptive Search mechanism (DAAS) that adjusts search depth to question difficulty. UAV-MAS with a 32B open-source MLLM achieves 77.0% overall accuracy on UAVQA-Bench, surpassing Gemini 3 Pro by 4.0\%, while the 8B variant improves 8.7\% over its base model.
Autonomous aerial systems increasingly rely on large language models (LLMs) for mission planning, perception, and decision-making; yet, the lack of standardized, physically grounded benchmarks limits systematic evaluation of their reasoning capabilities. To address this gap, we introduce UAVBench, an open benchmark dat...
M. Ferrag, Abderrahmane Lakas, Mérouane Debbah· IEEE Open Journal of Vehicul...· 16 citations
By systematically revealing the strengths and limitations of existing models in aerial-ground collaborative reasoning, AeroGround provides a foundation for developing more capable aerial-ground collaborative embodied intelligence systems.
Shenghong Yi, Lin Zhang, Muzian Li et al.· 0 citations
Air-Ground Object Search (AGOS) in urban environments is a challenging embodied task, which requires an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) and an Unmanned Ground Vehicle (UGV) to jointly search for and verify a specified target vehicle from multi-view visual references. To study this underexplored problem, we introduce AGOS...
This work introduces MissionBench, a benchmark for mission-level evaluation of MLLMs in aerial 3D environments, and shows that mission-level competence requires coordinating multiple capabilities beyond spatial perception, including multi-step planning and adaptive reasoning.
Suman Navaratnarajah, Taehyoung Kim, Jona Ruthardt et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
LAPF is the only evaluated approach that couples every detected hazard to a bounded, metric-neutral corrective action while maintaining near-goal stability, with zero clamp events in both scenarios, whereas CoT prompting increases from 9.7 to 14.0 events.
Yousef Emami, MohammadHossein Homaei, Hao Zhou et al.· 0 citations
This work proposes ARIES-Mission2, a zero-shot Vision-Language-Action (VLA) framework that decouples visual-semantic perception from physical route optimization in low-altitude Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) mission generation and indicates that the TSP module maintains lower growth in computation time as the number of...
Jun-Hao Wei, Yan-Xiao Li, Hao-Chen Li et al.· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.