Federated learning (FL) must serve devices with varying computational capabilities. A fixed model cannot suit all devices, while training one model per deployment limit is costly. Federated supernet training instead learns one elastic model with differently sized subnetworks, then deploys a suitable one to each device. When client inference budgets differ, however, parameters exclusive to high-cost subnetworks are reachable by fewer clients. We propose FEAST, a federated shared-space training framework that counters this imbalance by jointly training multiple subnetworks within each client's limit. Budget-tailored sub-supernet routing sends only the relevant supernet portion, and sparse aggregation merges the returned parameter slices. The trained supernet directly serves the subnetworks used during federation and supports post-hoc extraction of additional subnetworks without federated retraining. We further show that independently assigning clients'training-data volumes and inference budgets can distort accuracy--inference-cost comparisons in heterogeneous FL simulations, and introduce a one-parameter $\gamma$-allocation protocol to control this coupling. In our experimental setup, the SuperFedNAS and DeepFedNAS supernet training procedures remain near chance at 25M and reach at most $17.09\%$ at $596$M inference MACs; FEAST reaches $71.06\%$ at $596$M, $2.4$ points above the strongest model-heterogeneous weight-sharing baseline at its largest tier. Across CIFAR-100, CINIC-10, and TinyImageNet-200, FEAST achieves the highest population-averaged accuracy among the evaluated weight-sharing methods when each client receives its largest affordable subnetwork. Sub-supernet routing reduces aggregate model-parameter traffic by $6.8\times$ relative to full-supernet transmission.
Model Heterogeneous Federated Learning (MHFL) addresses client-level resource heterogeneity by allowing each participant to train a personalized model architecture under a shared training objective. A prevalent paradigm, Partial Training (PT), achieves this by allowing each client to train a subnetwork of the global model. However, existing PT methods typically rely on predefined architectural templates or over-parameterized supernets, limiting fine-grained personalization and imposing substantial computational and memory overhead. We propose FedJigsaw, a novel framework that reshapes model personalization as a dynamic and decentralized model assembly problem. Instead of selecting subnetworks from a predefined supernetwork, each client constructs its model by assembling reusable modules learned from neighboring clients. At the client level, we introduce AttenAssemble to enable each participant to adaptively construct a tailored model based on local observations. To support efficient knowledge sharing under communication and privacy constraints, we design SymbioArchitect, a mechanism that allows clients to exchange granular model modules with their topological neighbors. To mitigate training instability introduced by decentralized module exchange, we design CoRe-Tune, an attention-enhanced centralized training with a decentralized execution strategy, which guides local policies to foster implicit collaboration and stabilize training dynamics, without compromising data privacy. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that FedJigsaw outperforms state-of-the-art MHFL baselines by up to 13.8% in relative accuracy while significantly shrinking cross-client performance variance, but also slashes decision-making latency and peak memory footprint compared to existing policy-driven methods.
Federated learning (FL) on heterogeneous edge networks faces a fundamental tension: standard aggregation protocols assume client homogeneity, yet real-world edge deployments span device tiers with $7 \times$ compute and $\mathbf{1 0} \times$ bandwidth disparities. Slow clients become stragglers that stall synchronous rounds, while uniform gradient compression degrades accuracy on bandwidth-constrained devices. This paper presents FedEdge-Adapt, a novel adaptive federated learning framework that jointly addresses device heterogeneity, straggler mitigation, and communication efficiency without sacrificing model quality. FedEdge-Adapt introduces three tightly coupled mechanisms: (1) tier-aware gradient compression that applies device-class-specific sparsification ratios, (2) drift-corrected aggregation that reweights client updates based on staleness and data heterogeneity, and (3) predictive client selection that anticipates dropout-prone devices using a lightweight resource oracle. We evaluate FedEdge-Adapt on a 30-node heterogeneous edge network over 150 communication rounds using the CIFAR-10 dataset under non-IID distributions ($\alpha=0.5$ Dirichlet) and compare against FedAvg, FedProx, and SCAFFOLD baselines. FedEdge-Adapt achieves 85.44% global accuracy, a 6.85 percentage-point improvement over FedAvg, while simultaneously reducing round latency by $\mathbf{6 7. 4 \%}$, communication overhead by $\mathbf{3 4. 0 \%}$, and client dropout rate by $\mathbf{5 4. 0 \%}$. Convergence is reached in 18 rounds versus 31 for FedAvg. Extended experiments across 100+ rounds confirm long-term stability with no late-stage divergence.
Saher Elsayed, Mohamed Ali, Samer Abubaker et al.· Annual International Compute...· 0 citations
Federated learning of foundation models faces a fundamental resource-asymmetry challenge: the institutions holding the most valuable domain-specific data cannot host billion-parameter models. Existing heterogeneous federated approaches attempt to bridge this gap through parameter-efficient tuning, model pruning, or knowledge distillation, yet each trades away a critical property, whether full-model memory reduction, architectural self-containedness, or representational fidelity, leaving the core tension unresolved. We propose FedSLM, a parameter-centric framework for federated fine-tuning with heterogeneous compressed clients. FedSLM uses SVD-based decomposition to produce self-contained client models, whose low-rank subspaces form nested manifolds that are structurally compatible for aggregation. It then applies a two-stage protocol that synchronizes lightweight adapters within compression groups and fuses full-rank reconstructions across groups via structural alignment. Finally, a weak-to-strong elicitation step with auxiliary confidence loss transfers the aggregated knowledge to the full-scale server, while an explicit bias--variance trade-off mitigates compression artifacts. We provide theoretical guarantees for adapter-level aggregation, subspace-alignment bounds for cross-group fusion, and a characterization of how the confidence loss mitigates weak-supervision noise. Experiments on natural language and vision--language benchmarks show that FedSLM outperforms existing federated baselines under both IID and non-IID partitions, while client models operate at roughly 50% of the GPU memory required by the full model.
Shengkun Zhu, Jinshan Zeng, Zhihua Allen-Zhao et al.· 0 citations
Sub-model federated learning lets resource-constrained clients train width-reduced versions of a global model, but existing methods allocate capacity by device resources alone. A natural next step, allocating capacity by each client's data heterogeneity as estimated from the updates the server already observes, has been repeatedly suggested. We ask whether that step is possible, using HAS-FL, an adaptive capacity-allocation framework, as a test case. Our findings are threefold. First, validated against ground-truth label-distribution divergence on reproducible partitions, update-divergence estimates of client heterogeneity are dominated by capacity rather than data: across two corrected estimators, multiple datasets, and all seeds, the estimates correlate strongly and negatively with device capacity, and no data signal remains once capacity is controlled for. This previously undocumented confound affects any method estimating client statistics from sub-model updates. Second, adaptive allocation has a hidden failure mode: when every client is capped below full width, the uncovered parameters stay at random initialization and progressively corrupt the global model. A simple coverage guarantee removes the failure and explains why uniform allocation collapses. Third, a matched-budget control settles what adaptivity contributes: random allocation to the same average budget performs no differently on both image benchmarks, and on the naturally partitioned text benchmark the adaptive policy is the weakest of the three strategies while consuming the most capacity. Sub-model training remains valuable because it admits constrained clients at quadratically reduced cost, but what protects accuracy is parameter coverage rather than allocation intelligence. Its apparent benefits come from capacity budgeting and coverage, and future designs need heterogeneity signals separable from capacity effects.
Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative model training across distributed clients while keeping data local. A central challenge is determining which client updates are beneficial for aggregation with respect to each client's target domain. Existing methods typically address this problem in parameter space by comparing model parameters or gradients. However, parameter-space similarity can be a poor proxy for predictive behavior, especially under heterogeneous, non-IID data. Consequently, updates that are misaligned with a client's target domain, including those caused by heterogeneous data or malfunctioning clients, may degrade local model performance. We propose Local Inference Guided Aggregation for Heterogeneous Training Environments to Yield Enhancement Through Agreement and Regularization (LIGHTYEAR), a federated learning framework that performs update selection in function space. LIGHTYEAR uses an NTK-based agreement score to characterize predictive behavior and determine a personalized aggregation set for each client. By relating model parameters to local predictive responses, the Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) provides a more expressive criterion for update selection than parameter-space similarity alone. Because function-space information is not available before aggregation in conventional centralized FL, LIGHTYEAR uses a peer-to-peer (P2P) topology in which clients exchange updates directly and evaluate incoming models on private validation data. Each client selects only updates that are beneficial for its own target domain and aggregates them using a regularized rule that improves stability under heterogeneity. Across five datasets and nine baseline methods, LIGHTYEAR consistently outperforms centralized FL baselines and existing P2P approaches.
Mirko Konstantin, S. Zachow, Anirban Mukhopadhyay· 0 citations