Oct 2026· International Journal of Drug Delivery Technology· Vol 16· 0 citations· 7 references
TL;DR
A systematic review of human clinical studies assessing implant survival ≥1 year post-loading and reporting associated risk factors found major risk factors identified included smoking, history of periodontitis, poor oral hygiene, and uncontrolled diabetes mellitus.
Abstract
Background: Dental implants are advanced and widely regarded as a predictable treatment modality for the replacement of missing teeth. However, long-term survival is influenced by multiple biological, behavioral, and technical factors. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the risk factors affecting long-term implant survival. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed across PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for studies published between January 2013 and April 2024. Human clinical studies assessing implant survival ≥1 year post-loading and reporting associated risk factors were included. Study selection followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2 and ROBINS-I tools. Results: A total of 38 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Implant survival rates ranged from 85% to 98% across studies. Major risk factors identified included smoking, history of periodontitis, poor oral hygiene, and uncontrolled diabetes mellitus.
Dental implants are highly durable in terms of retention, but high survival does not establish long-term biological health or true treatment success: success rates were lower and definition-dependent, and peri-implant disease showed substantial variability.
V. Moraschini, Krisztina Mikulás, J. A. Shibli et al.· Periodontology 2000· 0 citations
Background: The utilization of vital pulp therapy (VPT) has significantly increased in immature and mature permanent teeth due to the advancement in calcium silicate-based biomaterials like Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA), Biodentine, and other modern bioceramic formulations. However, long-term longevity and available...
Ananya Kaul, Rajesh Shetty, Anil Pardeshi et al.· Journal of conservative dent...· 0 citations
Introduction: The routine use of antibiotic prophylaxis in dental implant surgery remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of preoperative antibiotics in preventing early implant failure and postoperative infection in healthy individuals.
Materials and Methods...
Background: Immediate loading, in which a dental implant is connected to a provisional or definitive prosthesis within one week of placement, has moved from an experimental departure from the two-stage osseointegration protocol to a routine option in many practices. Its adoption has outpaced agreement about which biolo...
Joseâne Marques de Sousa, Jamilly Vitória Souza Frota, Francisco Denílson Santos de Lima et al.· Archives of Current Research...· 0 citations
OBJECTIVE
To identify clinical factors influencing implant placement/timing decisions, through comparing survival, success, and complication rates of primary and secondary dental implantation following mandibular reconstruction.
DATA SOURCES
A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Centra...
Laura Zsófia Tasi, Ábel Major, A. S. Wenning et al.· Otolaryngology Head & Neck S...· 0 citations
Dental implants show favorable short-term outcomes, but evidence regarding their long-term survival and determinants of clinical success remains limited. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the 10-year clinical and radiographic outcomes of 750 dental implants placed in 500 patients, including implant survival, per...
Ankita Garg· Bioinformation· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
