Skip to content
Review Open access

Quantum Machine Learning in Oncology: A Systematic Review of Clinical Applications, Challenges, and Future Research Directions

Aug 2026 · Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction · 0 citations · 99 references

TL;DR

The findings show that QML research is dominated by classification and detection tasks, while segmentation is beginning to emerge, and overall, QML in oncology remains in its early stages of development.

Abstract

Quantum machine learning (QML) has emerged as a promising approach for analyzing the complex, high-dimensional data encountered in oncology, yet research in this area remains fragmented. This systematic literature review synthesizes current applications of QML in cancer care. Following PRISMA guidelines, six databases were searched for peer-reviewed English-language studies published between 2020 and 2026. Of the 212 records identified, 49 studies met the inclusion criteria after screening and quality assessment. The findings show that QML research is dominated by classification and detection tasks, while segmentation is beginning to emerge. Breast cancer and brain tumors are the most frequently investigated domains. Hybrid quantum-classical models, particularly quantum kernel methods, quantum neural networks, and quantum convolutional neural networks, are the predominant approaches. The main barriers to adoption are hardware limitations, including quantum noise, limited qubit availability, and reliance on simulators. Overall, QML in oncology remains in its early stages of development, with limited clinical validation, insufficient model interpretability, and little evidence of a clear quantum advantage. Future research should prioritize evaluation on real quantum hardware, larger and more diverse clinical datasets, standardized benchmarking against classical methods, and closer collaboration between computer scientists and oncology experts to facilitate clinical translation.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Jul 2026

A comparative evaluation of quantum machine learning architectures for breast cancer classification using clinical and genomic data

The results show that for high dimensional breast cancer data, currently available simulator-based QML models can learn meaningful patterns with limited quantum resources, but are not as effective as powerful classical machine learning models when complete feature representations are available.

Saartak Allena, Smrithy G. S., Balaji Chandrasekaran · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Quantum machine learning in diabetes and metabolism: Applications and translational challenges.

Preliminary studies highlight the promise of quantum machine learning for predictive and personalized management of metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus, however, successful clinical adoption will require robust validation pipelines, regulatory sandboxes, and harmonized compliance frameworks.

A. Riente, C. Serantoni, Michele Maria De Giulio et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Comparing Classical and Quantum Machine Learning Models for Breast Cancer Classification on the WDBC Dataset

Breast cancer is a major health concern, and early detection can make a great difference in treatment and survival rates for breast cancer patients. Machine learning methods have noticeably improved prediction accuracy on high-dimensional medical datasets and have become widely used tools in medical diagnostics. The tr...

Jovana Gluhovic · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Quantum technologies in clinical medicine: a systematic cross-domain synthesis and translational readiness taxonomy

A QML-framing-versus-evidence gap is confirmed in cardiology and oncology, where near-term clinical QML claims lack the computational proof-of-concept infrastructure that would logically need to precede them.

Raghavendra M. Devadas, S. T. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Benchmarking Quantum and Classical Machine Learning Models on Oncological Data

This work develops a methodology for fair benchmarking of quantum and classical machine learning models, based on the Red Cedar quantum machine learning and resource estimation framework and AutoML-optimized classical neural networks, and finds no evidence of quantum advantage.

Sydney Leither, Thomas Lubinski, Michael Kubal et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Machine learning and AI for cancer research and care: a review of applications, limitations, and future directions

This review synthesizes key developments in ML for oncology, covering foundational algorithms alongside emerging approaches, and describes future directions, including federated learning, graph neural networks, longitudinal modeling, and integration of real-world and wearable data to support precision oncology.

Kanishk Yadav, Taneesha Gupta · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.