Skip to content
Preprint

Probabilistic Stellar Mass and Radius Estimation with Bayesian Hierarchical Stacking

Oct 2026 · 0 citations · 8 references
Physics

TL;DR

A Bayesian machine-learning framework that combines three probabilistic models through Bayesian hierarchical stacking (BHS): a Bayesian additive regression tree model, a two-process heteroscedastic sparse Gaussian process, and a hierarchical Bayesian neural network to obtain more robust predictive distributions and reduce sensitivity to model misspecification and outliers.

Abstract

Accurate stellar parameters are essential for the characterisation of exoplanets, yet most host stars lack direct measurements of mass and radius. We aim to predict stellar masses and radii from commonly available observables and to quantify uncertainties and systematic effects in a way that is consistent with stellar observations. By not relying on a single model, we aim to obtain more robust predictive distributions and reduce sensitivity to model misspecification and outliers. We develop a Bayesian machine-learning framework that combines three probabilistic models through Bayesian hierarchical stacking (BHS): a Bayesian additive regression tree model, a two-process heteroscedastic sparse Gaussian process, and a hierarchical Bayesian neural network. The method propagates measurement uncertainties, accounts for correlations among inputs, and aggregates model variance into final predictive distributions. On a held-out test set the method attains a mean absolute relative difference (MARD) of 3.5% for mass and 2.1% for radius, improving on empirical-relation-based methods and standard machine-learning baselines. For 44 Kepler LEGACY stars, the BHS masses differ from estimates obtained with the BAyesian STellar Algorithm (BASTA) by a MARD of 4.8%, compared with 8.5% between the empirical relations and BASTA. Applied to about 2400 exoplanet host stars, the predictions differ from literature values by a MARD of 2.7% in both mass and radius. Residual analysis reveals mild underestimation for cool dwarfs, consistent with sparse training coverage, and positive offsets near the main-sequence turn-off that may reflect priors in isochrone-based catalogues. Internal consistency with g = GM/R^2 is greater for the BHS predictions, with a scatter in Delta log g lower by a factor of three than that of the literature values.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Oct 2026

The mass discrepancy problem in massive stars: an inferential perspective

Bayesian inference has become a standard tool for inferring stellar parameters from stellar evolution models. However, comparatively little attention has been paid to how alternative Bayesian likelihood formulations influence inferred stellar parameters, and the resulting evolutionary mass discrepancy for massive main...

C. I. Eze, G. Handler, M. Vanrespaille et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

LACHESIS: Robust stellar parameters through Bayesian model averaging of isochrone grids

Accurate stellar parameters underpin much of modern astrophysics, from the characterisation of exoplanetary systems to Galactic archaeology. For isolated field stars, masses and especially ages are most often inferred by comparing observed properties against stellar evolution models, yet these inferences depend on the...

J. Vines, A. Ware · 0 citations
Review Oct 2026

The Radius-Luminosity Relationship for Active Galactic Nuclei with Hierarchical Bayesian Reverberation Mapping

Reverberation mapping of active galactic nuclei uses the time taken for variability to travel through the system as a measure of system size, with this size being used to inform estimates of the mass of the central black hole, a technique that has graduated to an industrial-scale effort in recent decades. Such large ta...

H. McDougall, T. Davis, B. Pope et al. · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Towards breaking the degeneracy between stellar ages and unresolved multiplicity

Stellar age is the central desirable parameter we need to disentangle different Galactic formation scenarios. Nevertheless, no stellar age dating method is completely model-independent. Even in the best-case scenarios, present-day stellar age estimates are only precise to $\sim7\%$ and accurate to $\sim10-15\%$. A main...

Friedrich Anders, A. Queiroz, S. Malhotra et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

GyroNet: Well-calibrated Rotation-based Stellar Ages from a Machine Learning and Bayesian Framework with Gaia DR3 Features

Stellar age is among the most difficult fundamental parameters to measure, yet it anchors the interpretation of astrophysical systems across many contexts. Gyrochronology provides an empirically grounded route to stellar ages via rotation, leveraging photometric rotation periods routinely measured in time-domain survey...

Amit Dethe, M. Soares-Furtado · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

A deep learning approach to member identification and mass estimation in galaxy clusters

Accurate dynamical mass estimates of galaxy clusters are essential for studies of cluster formation and evolution and for cosmological applications. However, interloper galaxies, which are not gravitationally bound to the cluster but are incorrectly identified as members, can bias dynamical mass measurements and increa...

Zi-Cheng Wang, Li-Ping Fu, Wei Du et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.