Skip to content
Case report Open access

Volumetric stability and patient-reported outcomes after soft-tissue augmentation: A case series.

Oct 2026 · Clinical Advances in Periodontics · 0 citations · 14 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Peri-implant soft-tissue augmentation with a porcine acellular dermal matrix showed partial volumetric maintenance over 2 years and favorable patient-reported outcomes, which highlight that patients' perceptions and measured tissue changes reflect different aspects of treatment outcomes.

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 2-year volumetric stability and patient-reported outcomes following peri-implant soft-tissue augmentation with a porcine acellular dermal matrix.

Methods

This prospective case series included patients requiring implant-supported rehabilitation with buccal peri-implant soft-tissue deficiency and mucosal thickness <2 mm. A porcine acellular dermal matrix was used for buccal soft-tissue augmentation. Digital intraoral scans were obtained at baseline, immediately after surgery, and at 10 days, 1 month, 3 months, and 24 months. Volumetric variation and mean distance were assessed by three-dimensional scan superimposition. Clinical parameters and patient-reported outcome measures, including visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, analgesic consumption, and Oral Health Impact Profile-14, were recorded.

Results

Six patients contributing eight implant sites were treated; five patients completed the 24-month follow-up. An early increase in soft-tissue volume was observed immediately after surgery and at 10 days, followed by progressive contraction during healing. At 24 months, the mean volumetric change remained slightly positive, although the mean thickness gain was minimal and inter-site variability was substantial. Clinical parameters remained stable, and patient-reported outcomes indicated limited morbidity and generally favorable oral health-related quality of life.

Conclusion

Within the limitations of this prospective case series, peri-implant soft-tissue augmentation with a porcine acellular dermal matrix showed partial volumetric maintenance over 2 years and favorable patient-reported outcomes. Controlled studies are needed to confirm these preliminary findings. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY The soft tissues surrounding dental implants contribute to their protection and appearance. When tissue volume is insufficient, surgery may be considered to increase it. This commonly involves harvesting connective tissue from the patient's palate, creating an additional surgical wound that may cause discomfort. Porcine acellular dermal matrices, derived from pig skin processed to remove cells, offer an alternative that avoids tissue harvesting. This case series examined changes in soft-tissue volume over 2 years after augmentation with a porcine acellular dermal matrix. Tissue volume was measured using repeated digital scans of the mouth. Clinical outcomes, postoperative pain, pain medication use, and oral health-related quality of life were also assessed. The initial postoperative increase in tissue volume progressively diminished, with limited remaining gains and considerable variation between implant sites at 2 years. Patients generally reported favorable oral health-related quality of life despite limited volume maintenance, while postoperative pain varied between individuals. These findings highlight that patients' perceptions and measured tissue changes reflect different aspects of treatment outcomes. This study does not establish predictable long-term tissue augmentation with the procedure investigated. Larger controlled studies are needed to determine its effectiveness and potential clinical applications.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Oct 2026

Soft And Hard Tissue Evaluation Following Delayed Dental Implant Placement With and Without Porcine-Derived Collagen Matrix: A 4-Month Clinico-Radiological Study

The adjunctive use of a porcine-derived collagen matrix during delayed implant placement resulted in superior peri-implant soft tissue outcomes without adversely affecting crestal bone stability, suggesting the porcine-derived collagen matrix may serve as a predictable, minimally invasive option for peri-implant soft t...

S. Parveen, Preeti Upadhyay, Pragya Tripathi et al. · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Three-Dimensional Digital Quantification of Peri-Implant Mucosal Volume Using Intraoral Scanning

3D volumetric analysis demonstrated excellent measurement reproducibility and provided quantitative assessment of peri-implant mucosal changes over 6 months, and Percentage mucosal volume gain was associated with mucosal thickness, keratinized mucosa width, and selected clinical peri-implant parameters.

Harneet Chopra · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Prospective multicenter study on patient-related outcomes of orbital floor reconstruction using ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene

This prospective, multicenter clinical study evaluated patient-reported outcomes, functional recovery, and quality of life following orbital floor reconstruction using ultra-high-molecular-weight-polyethylene (UHMWPE) implants. The study emphasized both subjective recovery and the clinical performance of the implant ma...

Stefanie Wilhelm, R. Preidl, Konstantinos Afxentiou et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Lightweight Breast Implants in Augmentation-Mastopexy: A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical, Aesthetic, and Patient-Reported Outcomes

Augmentation-mastopexy is a complex procedure with high demands on soft tissue support and long-term aesthetic stability. Implant weight is a key biomechanical factor contributing to tissue stretching, inferior pole elongation, and secondary ptosis. Polytech B-Lite implants reduce implant mass preserving volume a...

C. Mele, Santolo D'Antonio, Vincenzo Rullo · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Patient-Reported Lifestyle Recovery and Clinical Implant Outcomes Following Immediate Versus Delayed Implant Placement

Immediate placement was associated with faster patient-reported lifestyle recovery, earlier functional rehabilitation, lower early postoperative pain, and greater treatment satisfaction, while long-term implant survival remained comparable between the two approaches.

Mohammad Wasimuddin · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.