Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes after customized elastodontic appliance therapy in mixed dentition children with maxillary transverse deficiency: a retrospective CBCT study
It is suggested that CEA may expand maxillary and mandibular arches in mixed dentition children with maxillary transverse deficiency with preliminary CBCT-based evidence for the transverse expansion effects of CEA in mixed dentition children.
Abstract
This exploratory study aimed to evaluate the expansion effects of a customized elastodontic appliance (CEA) on maxillary and mandibular arches in mixed dentition children using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and to clarify whether these effects are dental, dentoalveolar, or skeletal.
This retrospective study included 31 mixed dentition children (mean age 8.3 ± 1.2 years) who underwent CEA treatment for 8.2 ± 1.3 months. Pre- and post-treatment CBCT images were used to measure width changes at three levels: cusp, alveolar bone, and apical basal bone. Paired t-tests were used for comparisons.
Significant increases were observed at cusp and alveolar levels. At the cusp level, maxillary inter-canine width increased by 2.97 mm ± 1.31 mm (95% CI: 2.49–3.45,
P
< 0.001), and mandibular inter-canine width by 2.39 mm ± 1.32 mm (95% CI: 1.91–2.87,
P
< 0.001). Maxillary second primary molar buccal cusp width increased by 1.67 mm
±
0.85 mm (95% CI: 1.36–1.98,
P
< 0.001), and mandibular counterpart by 1.26 mm
±
1.11 mm (95% CI: 0.85–1.67,
P
< 0.001). At the alveolar bone level, maxillary alveolar crest width increased by 1.39 mm ± 1.09 mm (95% CI: 0.99–1.79,
P
< 0.001), whereas mandibular alveolar crest width showed a minimal increase of 0.38 mm ± 0.75 mm (95% CI: 0.10–0.66,
P
= 0.008). No significant changes were observed in apical basal bone width in either arch.
The findings suggest that CEA may expand maxillary and mandibular arches in mixed dentition children with maxillary transverse deficiency. The maxillary expansion effect primarily involves dental movement and adaptive dentoalveolar change, without significant deep basal bone changes. In the mandible, significant dental expansion was observed at the cusp level, while the alveolar bone changes were minimal and should be interpreted cautiously. These findings provide preliminary CBCT-based evidence for the transverse expansion effects of CEA in mixed dentition children.
Not applicable. This is a retrospective, anonymous observational study without prospective intervention or a clinical trial protocol.
Patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion may have limited alveolar support around the mandibular incisors, but conventional cephalometric measures do not directly describe the root-alveolus relationship. This retrospective cross-sectional study quantified labial and lingual alveolar bone thickness and examined whe...
T. Nguyen, Huong Ly Nguyen, Thi Dung Dao et al.· PLoS ONE· 0 citations
Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the craniofacial effects of non-extraction class II camouflage treatment using maxillary distalization and intermaxillary class II elastics in late adolescent patients.Methods: This retrospective study included 26 patients (20 females, 6 males; mean age: 15.2±1.3 years) with skeletal...
M. B. Kadıoğlu, Meyra Durmaz, M. Rübendiz· Anatolian Current Medical Jo...· 0 citations
Sagittal A-point displacement was observed following Alt-RAMEC/2-HME in late-growth skeletal Class III patients with maxillary retrusion, however, in the absence of an untreated age- and skeletal maturity-matched control group, the observed displacement cannot be distinguished definitively from the normal craniofacial...
N. Tanrısever, Hatice Gökalp· Diagnostics· 0 citations
Whether BAMP can stabilise maxillary position during growth in milder discrepancies, and thereby reduce the likelihood of later orthognathic surgery, requires confirmation in controlled studies.
A. Brudnicki, Marcin Olek, Zbigniew Surowiec et al.· Scientific Reports· 0 citations
INTRODUCTION
It is generally accepted that the optimal timing for functional orthodontic treatment in patients with Class II malocclusion and mandibular retrusion is during the circumpubertal growth period (cervical vertebral maturation stage [CS] 3-CS4). However, these patients often present with excessive overjet and...
Rui Jiang, Jing-Cheng Chen, Weiying Zheng et al.· American Journal of Orthodon...· 0 citations
These findings support individualized CBCT-based anatomical assessment before implant planning, periodontal evaluation, orthodontic treatment, orthodontic treatment, and dentoalveolar surgery.
Birkan Eyup Yilmaz, Feridun Abay, Büşra Nur Gökkurt Yılmaz· Farabi Tıp Dergisi· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.