Skip to content
Meta-analysis Open access

CagriSema versus Semaglutide 2.4 mg monotherapy for weight management in adults with overweight or obesity, with or without type 2 diabetes: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis

Oct 2026 · Frontiers in Endocrinology · Vol 17 · 0 citations · 48 references
Medicine

TL;DR

CagriSema produces clinically meaningful additional weight loss and modest improvements in surrogate cardiometabolic measures compared with semaglutide 2.4 mg alone, at the cost of more frequent injection-site reactions and, at most, modestly more frequent gastrointestinal events.

Abstract

Introduction Semaglutide 2.4 mg is the reference pharmacotherapy for weight management, yet many patients do not reach ambitious weight-loss targets. CagriSema, a fixed-dose combination of cagrilintide and semaglutide, may offer additional benefit through complementary mechanisms. We quantified its incremental efficacy and safety against semaglutide 2.4 mg monotherapy in adults with overweight or obesity, with and without type 2 diabetes. Methods This PRISMA 2020–compliant review (PROSPERO CRD420261380458) searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, ScienceDirect, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP to 30 June 2026 for randomised controlled trials comparing CagriSema with semaglutide 2.4 mg or placebo. Effects were pooled within two prespecified comparator strata using random-effects models with restricted maximum likelihood estimation of τ² and a Hartung–Knapp–Sidik–Jonkman small-sample adjustment, with prediction intervals, leave-one-out and phase-3a-restricted sensitivity analyses, trial sequential analysis. Results Five trials (4,746 unique participants) were included. Versus semaglutide 2.4 mg, CagriSema produced greater weight loss (mean difference −6.89 percentage points, 95% CI −8.70 to −5.06; I² = 33%; prediction interval −8.91 to −4.86), a greater absolute reduction in body weight (−7.16 kg, 95% CI −9.15 to −5.17) and in body-mass index (−2.41 kg/m², 95% CI −2.83 to −1.99), and roughly twice the likelihood of reaching a 20% reduction (RR 2.10, 95% CI 1.78 to 2.47). Waist circumference fell further (−4.07 cm, 95% CI −5.10 to −3.04). No incremental glycaemic benefit was detected, with intervals for glycated haemoglobin (−0.07, 95% CI −0.14 to 0.01) and fasting plasma glucose lying entirely within prespecified minimal important differences. Injection-site reactions were more frequent (RR 3.14, 95% CI 1.42 to 6.96); gastrointestinal adverse events were not significantly increased under the primary model (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.21). Conclusion CagriSema produces clinically meaningful additional weight loss and modest improvements in surrogate cardiometabolic measures compared with semaglutide 2.4 mg alone, at the cost of more frequent injection-site reactions and, at most, modestly more frequent gastrointestinal events. The evidence is insufficient to determine whether serious adverse events or neoplasms differ between treatments, and long-term durability, cardiovascular outcomes and body composition remain undetermined. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420261380458.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Oct 2026

Efficacy and Safety of CagriSema in Type 2 Diabetes: A Dose- and Comparator-Specific Systematic Review and Bayesian Meta-Analysis.

CagriSema provides substantial glycaemic and body-weight benefits versus placebo and is more evident for body-weight reduction, while comparative gastrointestinal tolerability and discontinuation risk remain uncertain.

C. S. Kow, A. F. Zaihan, D. Ramachandram et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Efficacy and Safety of Remogliflozin in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with Trial Sequential Analysis

Introduction: Remogliflozin is a sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor used for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), but its overall efficacy and safety remain fragmented. This updated systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of remogliflozin using evidence exclusively from randomized contro...

N. Kostadinov, T. Totomirova, Z. Kirovakov et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Efficacy and safety of once-weekly Semaglutide for weight management in adults with overweight or obesity with or without type 2 diabetes: A real-world clinical trial in Bangladesh

Introduction: Semaglutide has shown substantial weight reduction in trials, but real-world evidence from South Asian populations is scarce. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide 2·4 mg over 26 weeks in adults with overweight or obesity, with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods...

Q. T. Islam · 0 citations
Review Open access Nov 2026

CagriSema 2.4/2.4 mg versus CagriSema 1.0/1.0 mg in adults with type 2 diabetes: a dose-comparison systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background: Once-weekly cagrilintide-semaglutide (CagriSema) has been evaluated at two maintenance doses, 2.4/2.4 mg and 1.0/1.0 mg, in type 2 diabetes (T2DM), but they have not been directly compared. We compared their efficacy and safety. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL for randomized contro...

B. M. Diefenthaeler, L. E. D. Canto, G. Pretto et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Economic evaluation of tirzepatide, semaglutide, and liraglutide in the treatment of obese and overweight patients without diabetes: a short-term cost-effectiveness analysis in Iran

Although tirzepatide provided greater health benefits, its higher cost limited its cost-effectiveness at current prices, and semaglutide was the cost-effective injectable GLP-1-1-based therapy in Iran.

Negin Reiszadeh, R. Radmanesh, R. Heshmat et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.