American Joint Committee on Cancer PS offers superior prognostic stratification compared to UICC AS in high-risk luminal breast cancer, and incorporation into clinical practice may enable more personalized treatment approaches, particularly when identifying candidates for adjuvant abemaciclib therapy.
Abstract
Introduction: Breast cancer remains the most prevalent malignancy among women worldwide, with prognostic outcomes and therapeutic responses differing considerably across subtypes. The conventional staging framework developed by the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC), based on the Tumor, Node, Metastasis classification, reflects anatomical stage (AS) but overlooks biological characteristics. To address this limitation, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) introduced the Prognostic Stage (PS) in its 8th edition, which integrates biomarkers including estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and histological grade (HG). This study aimed to assess and compare the prognostic utility of UICC AS and AJCC PS in patients with high-risk luminal breast cancer. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent surgery for ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer at Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital from 2011 to 2018. High-risk classification was defined based on MonarchE trial criteria: axillary lymph node metastasis, tumor diameter ≥5 cm, HG3, or Ki-67 ≥20%. Staging was performed using both UICC AS and AJCC PS, and prognostic values were evaluated via Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results: Among 105 eligible cases, 43 (41%) were downstaged when reclassified from UICC AS to AJCC PS. While UICC AS failed to yield significant stratification in terms of invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), AJCC PS demonstrated significant prognostic discrimination (IDFS p = 0.014; DRFS p = 0.004). Conclusions: American Joint Committee on Cancer PS offers superior prognostic stratification compared to UICC AS in high-risk luminal breast cancer. Its incorporation into clinical practice may enable more personalized treatment approaches, particularly when identifying candidates for adjuvant abemaciclib therapy. Further validation through larger, prospective studies is warranted.
Background: Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy among women and a significant health burden in South Africa. The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th Edition incorporates biological markers (oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2] status...
Rahmiz R. Thomas, Tahlia Naidoo, Uchechukwu A. N. Izegbu et al.· South African Journal of Onc...· 0 citations
Breast cancer survival is shaped by a complex interaction of tumor-specific, biological, and patient-related factors. Stage at diagnosis remains the strongest predictor of outcome. Tumor size, nodal involvement, and histologic grade further aid in prognostic prediction by reflecting the biological aggressiveness of the...
Lorent Sijarina, O. Alqaisi, Drilon Bytyçi et al.· Exploration of Medicine· 0 citations
Background Breast cancer (BC) mortality risk extends over decades; yet, the temporal prognostic patterns of histological grade across subtypes and stages remain unclear. Patients and methods Women with stage I-III BC diagnosed between 2000 and 2018 were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results regist...
M. Mariani, M. Ochocki, G. Bianchini et al.· ESMO Open· 0 citations
Background: Risk stratification after curative resection remains challenging in stage II-III colorectal cancer (CRC). The cancer inflammation prognostic index (CIPI) has been proposed as a novel prognostic marker; however, whether high-risk stage II disease, as defined by CIPI, has outcomes comparable to those of stage...
Traditional pathological markers remain relevant in prognostic assessment for solid tumors, but their clinical value may differ according to tumor biological context. This study evaluated the prognostic significance of Ki-67, histological grade, and vascular invasion (VI) in breast and colorectal cancer, with empha...
Hong-Yan Ji, Bin-Zheng Liu, Li-Sha Xie· Medicine· 0 citations
BACKGROUND
Stage at diagnosis, histologic grade, and molecular subtypes are established prognostic indicators for women with breast cancer (BC), but their impact on population-based survival estimates is poorly documented. This study assessed long-term BC survival trends according to these factors.
METHODS
We identif...
Fabiola Giudici, D. Serraino, F. Puglisi et al.· The Oncologist· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.