Oct 2026· Frontiers in Ocean Sustainability· Vol 4· 0 citations· 98 references
Abstract
There is an increasing need to carry out cumulative effects assessment (CEA) in marine environments to support ecosystem-based management (EBM) and achieve Good Environmental Status (GES) under European and global policy frameworks. This need has been addressed by the 4 year major European project GES4SEAS, which has developed and operationalized an innovative, science-based toolbox to assess and predict the impacts of multiple human pressures, including climate change, on marine ecosystems, their functioning, and the delivery of ecosystem services and societal benefits. To achieve this objective, during the project, we proposed a framework which overcame major challenges, as shown in this review, through progress in recent years. For that, GES4SEAS implemented a co-creation approach involving a high-level Practitioners Advisory Board, ensuring alignment with policy needs and enhancing the uptake of results. This enabled developing a comprehensive conceptual and analytical framework linking EBM principles with key management elements and appropriate methodological tools, thereby bridging the gap between theory and implementation. Significant progress has been made in understanding cumulative effects by integrating statistical, empirical and mechanistic models, which increased identifying non-linear responses, tipping points and ecological feedbacks. In parallel, the project delivered a suite of interoperable tools, centered on the Tikta software and supported by other tools, enabling holistic assessments of pressures, ecosystem components and services. These tools were rigorously tested across multiple European and international case studies (“Learning Sites”), demonstrating their robustness, transferability and applicability across diverse ecological and data contexts. As such, GES4SEAS represents a major step forward in the state-of-the-art of CEA by transforming fragmented approaches into an integrated, operational workflow to inform marine governance. The project provides practical decision-support systems that enhance transparency, address uncertainties and facilitate adaptive management. By strengthening the science–policy interface and enabling informed decision-making, GES4SEAS has contributed directly to sustainable ocean governance and the achieving environmental and socio-economic objectives under global change.
Europe’s seas are at the nexus of a “triple crisis” of biodiversity and habitat loss, climate change, and pollution, increasingly eroding the ecosystems’ resilience and capacity to provide ecosystem services. Although essential, existing European Union policies, especially the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)...
E. Bigagli, S. Korpinen, Jesper H. Andersen et al.· Frontiers in Marine Science· 0 citations
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has emerged as a fundamental instrument in environmental planning and decision-making processes across the globe. It provides a structured and systematic approach for identifying, predicting, and evaluating the potential environmental, social, and economic impacts of proposed devel...
Sushmita Ghosh, Chayan Biswas· International Journal of Cre...· 0 citations
The Southern Indian Ocean Fisheries Agreement (SIOFA) is legally mandated through its founding
agreement to implement an Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries Management (EAFM). However, like
many Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs), translating this principle into effective
practice poses significant challen...
M. Milardi· Journal of Northwest Atlanti...· 0 citations
Nature‐based solutions (NBSs) have been introduced as an effective approach for climate change resilience and a set of actions to conserve, restore and sustainably manage natural or modified ecosystems, while simultaneously providing benefits to human well‐being and biodiversity. This research highlights how NBSs can c...
Ghader Arabi, Esmail Karamidehkordi, Enayat Abbasi· People and Nature· 0 citations
Ecosystem Services (ES), or Nature’s Contributions to People (NCP), are increasingly understood as products of interactions between natural and anthropogenic inputs. However, co-production remains unevenly implemented in ecosystem assessments. Rather than seeking to measure or causally decompose co-production across al...
Christos Zoumides, Emily Bank, Salwa Aabid et al.· One Ecosystem· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.