Oct 2026· Environmental Science and Technology· Vol 60, pp. 29791 - 29801· 0 citations· 33 references
Medicine
TL;DR
This Perspective introduces a three-pillar framework for ESE-LLMs: domain perception, knowledge grounding, and action capability, and presents a decision-guided deployment workflow that helps researchers in ESE fields integrate LLMs into their workflow.
Abstract
The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has fundamentally transformed information interaction, yet their application in environmental science and engineering (ESE) is hindered by multimodal data formats, dynamic context requirements, and hallucination risks. To transition from general-purpose models to domain expert agentic systems, this Perspective introduces a three-pillar framework for ESE-LLMs: domain perception, knowledge grounding, and action capability. Implementing these capabilities introduces potential pitfalls such as geographic representation bias, catastrophic forgetting, and source authenticity vulnerabilities, which require strategic model blending and careful data curation to overcome. Furthermore, rigorous evaluation must extend beyond standard knowledge benchmarks to systematically assess factuality, fairness, consistency, and safety using both human and automated metrics. Finally, we present a decision-guided deployment workflow that helps researchers in ESE fields integrate LLMs into their workflow. Ultimately, achieving trustworthy environmental intelligence relies on continuous evaluation, robust governance, and sustained interdisciplinary collaboration to safely deploy agentic ESE-LLMs for high-stakes environmental challenges.
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in natural language understanding, generation, and reasoning, but their reliance on static parametric knowledge still leads to knowledge staleness, hallucinations, limited domain adaptability, weak traceability, and high updating costs in knowledge-in...
Xiao-Ling Shu, Xiao Zhang, Rui-Xin Wang et al.· Artificial Intelligence Revi...· 0 citations
: Large language models are increasingly used in open-ended interactions, where safety requires more than detecting explicit harmful requests. A model must distinguish harmful intents that warrant refusal from benign needs that should remain supported, including in ethically complex contexts. Existing safety alignment...
Kai Zhang, Yu Yan, Tian-Liang Lu et al.· Computers, Materials & C...· 0 citations
Large Language Model (LLM) agents are increasingly deployed in high-stakes settings such as industrial maintenance and equipment fault troubleshooting, where workers occupy a variety of roles. A capable agent must therefore act in a way that is calibrated to user's role: taking actions and providing information that re...
Hainiu Xu, Vítor N. Lourenço, Mohnish Dubey et al.· 0 citations
Bridging the gap between human intent and machine logic remains a critical challenge in data access for non-technical users, yet Large Language Models (LLMs) remain unreliable: they hallucinate schema elements, generate syntactically invalid queries, or fail to capture user intent. These limitations are especially crit...
AnyAct is a universal action layer that unifies available capabilities into a self-evolving action space, enabling agents to operate efficiently and reliably in large-scale, dynamic tool ecosystems and optimizes for a balance between task success rate and execution cost.
Ling-Rui Xu, Ya Jiang, Jia-Chang Zhang et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.