Skip to content
Open access

Search for prognostic factors when prescribing immunotherapy in the second line of treatment for metastatic gastric cancer

Oct 2026 · Malignant tumours · Vol 16, pp. 44-52 · 0 citations · 12 references

TL;DR

The results obtained leave a reasonable assumption that a group of patients on the 1st line had PFS > 8 months and a normal baseline LDH level, and they had real benefits from ICI therapy with the 2nd line therapy for metastatic gastric cancer.

Abstract

Introduction. It has been previously reported that the effectiveness of therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in the second line of metastatic gastric cancer was not higher than with cytostatic therapy, and did not depend on the level of PD-L1 CPS and the presence of MSI. At the same time, 28 % of patients lived more than 2 years after starting therapy. Aim . To identify the criteria for predicting overall survival (OS) in patients receiving second-line ICI therapy. Materials and methods . We assessed 91 patients with morphologically confirmed metastatic gastric or cardioesophageal junction cancer who progressed during the 1st line of treatment and received ICI therapy in the 2nd line. The median follow-up time was 54.2 months (28–90 months). Patient characteristics : 53.8 % of patients were males; average age — 65.7 years (34.1–85.7); ECOG 2 performance status in 9.9 %; synchronous metastases — 56 %; liver / peritoneum metastases — 69.3 %; metastases in 3 or more organs — 17.6 %; CPS > 10–41.8 %; MSI — 43.5 %. Results. A univariate analysis which included 22 indicators showed a negative effect on OS after 1st line therapy with PFS < 8 months, LDH level > 248 U / L, neutrophil / lymphocyte ratio (NLR) < 2.35, platelet / neutrophil ratio (PNR) > 168.7. In multifactorial analysis, significance was stated for the 1st line with PFS > 8 months (HR 3.541; 95 % CI 1.186–10.576, p = 0.024) and LDH level < 248 U / l (HR 4.606; 95 % CI 1.847–11.484, p = 0.001). When assessing long-term outcomes in patients with or without risk factors, we found that in the absence of negative prognostic factors the mPFS was 19.7 months, while in the presence it was only 3.4 months (HR 3.47; 95 % CI 1.2–10.03, p = 0.022). The OS was 33.4 months and 5.4 months. (HR 4.028; 95 % CI 1.376–11.793, p = 0.011), respectively. When comparing these groups by their main characteristics, we noticed that there were no differences in ECOG status, the number of organs with metastases, the frequency of CPS ≥ 10 and MSI. Conclusions. The results obtained leave a reasonable assumption that a group of patients on the 1st line had PFS > 8 months and a normal baseline LDH level. And they had real benefits from ICI therapy with the 2nd line therapy for metastatic gastric cancer. However, a more accurate validation requires a prospective study.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Efficacy and Safety of Reduced-Dose Chemotherapy Plus Nivolumab in Elderly Advanced Gastric Cancer

Reduced-dose chemotherapy plus nivolumab may be an effective and less toxic first-line option for elderly patients with AGC, according to retrospectively collected clinical data from 70 patients aged 70 years or older with AGC.

Toshihiko Matsumoto, S. Sugimoto, R. Omori et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Nivolumab Versus Axitinib in the Second-Line Treatment of Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Two-Center Experience

In this two-center retrospective cohort, nivolumab was associated with longer PFS and OS than axitinib in the second-line treatment of mRCC, and these associations remained significant after adjustment for IMDC risk group and year of treatment initiation.

Irfan Bugday, İlknur Deliktaş Onur, M. Inanc et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Immunotherapy with Pembrolizumab beyond Progression and Local Ablative Therapy in Oligoprogressive Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

In this retrospective analysis, treatment BPD was not associated with an improved prognosis compared to 2L therapy and there is a need to improve and implement criteria to select patients who truly benefit from this treatment approach.

A. Oseledchyk, L. Häcker, A. Schmitt et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Treatment-Free Interval as a Prognostic Factor for Survival Outcomes in Patients with Advanced or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer Treated with Pembrolizumab Plus Lenvatinib: A Multi-Institutional Real-World Cohort Study

Simple Summary Endometrial cancer that returns or spreads after first-line chemotherapy is difficult to treat. The combination of pembrolizumab (an immunotherapy) and lenvatinib (a targeted therapy) is a standard second-line option, but clinicians have few tools for estimating the prognosis of individual patients. Usin...

Chih-Wen Su, Shao-Jing Wang, Yu-Hsiang Shih et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.