Aug 2026· Journal of Emergency Management· 0 citations· 12 references
TL;DR
The research examines how varying levels of AI transparency directly influence emergency responders’ decision-making during crises, exploring the delicate balance between operational openness and security considerations.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) stands at the forefront of transforming emergency management, offering unprecedented capabilities in disaster preparedness and response. Recent implementations demonstrate this shift from reactive to proactive approaches, particularly through flood prediction algorithms and maritime search-and-rescue optimization systems that integrate real-time vessel locations and weather data. However, the current landscape reveals a critical challenge: The opacity of AI systems creates a significant trust deficit among emergency responders and communities. Research findings paint a concerning picture of this transparency gap. A comprehensive survey of emergency management AI systems reveals striking statistics: 68 percent lack adequate documentation of their data sources, while 42 percent fail to provide clear justifications for their recommendations. This “black box” phenomenon carries serious implications, particularly when flood prediction models disproportionately affect vulnerable populations or when opaque decision-making processes lead to suboptimal resource allocation during critical rescue operations. Analysis of real-world applications in flood preparedness and search-and-rescue operations exposes systematic communication deficiencies within these essential emergency response frameworks. The research examines how varying levels of AI transparency directly influence emergency responders’ decision-making during crises, exploring the delicate balance between operational openness and security considerations. These findings highlight an urgent need for robust oversight mechanisms and context-specific transparency protocols to ensure ethical AI deployment in emergency management. The evidence points toward a clear solution: developing human-centric approaches that enhance rather than replace human capabilities in emergency response. This strategy requires establishing tailored transparency guidelines and monitoring systems that address current challenges while facilitating effective AI integration. By prioritizing both technological advancement and human oversight, emergency management systems can better serve their critical public safety mission.
Modern Disaster Management Systems (DMS) are currently shifting from reactive hazard response to proactive, intelligent resilience architectures. As global hazards escalate in both frequency and severity, classical mitigation lifecycles are increasingly burdened by severe latency in information processing and resource...
Risav Dey· International Journal For Mu...· 0 citations
The transition towards smart megacities has deeply integrated Artificial Intelligence (AI) with power–transport networks. While AI empowers complex operations like multi-network coordinated dispatch and emergency rescue, current algorithm-centric perspectives largely ignore its massive physical energy costs. Accordingl...
Chenxuan Zhang, Peixiao Fan, Si-Qi Bu et al.· Applied Informatics· 0 citations
Background: Supply chain resilience (SCR) is critical for maintaining business continuity and competitive advantage in a global environment increasingly prone to disruptions like natural hazards and geopolitical tensions. However, a significant problem exists in the lack of standardised, data-driven metrics to compare...
Ali Skaf, Gael Pallares· Journal of Transport and Sup...· 0 citations
Climate change has significantly increased the severity of natural disasters, causing serious issues in telecommunication infrastructures when connectivity is most needed, especially for saving lives. Although current 4G and 5G networks integrate resilience procedures, such as infrastructure reinforcement and temporary...
Fatima Zahra Hassani Alaoui, J. el Abbadi· Transactions on Engineering...· 0 citations
Humanitarian and disaster response supply chains operate under extreme uncertainty, time pressure, and resource constraints, where delays or misallocations directly translate into human suffering and loss of life. In recent years, predictive intelligence models have emerged as critical enablers for enhancing supply cha...
Abiola Idowu, Abimbola Caleb Adesemoye, Esther Sydney et al.· International Journal of Mul...· 0 citations
The devastating California wildfires of January 2025 underscored the staggering human and economic tolls of escalating climate disasters. While retrospective analyses often attribute these losses to climate change, fuel accumulation, and wildland-urban interface expansion, a critical systemic blind spot remains: the in...
Ramit Debnath, Aric P. Shafran, Israel Waichman· Communications Earth & Envir...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.