Skip to content
Review Open access

A Peer-Assisted-Student-Support Scheme to Enhance Student Outcomes and Foster Inclusivity, Self-Confidence and Motivation

2026 · Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Enquiry · Vol 1 · 0 citations

Abstract

Science and Engineering subjects require high levels of student efforts and self-motivation for understanding complex concepts, often abstract and counter intuitive. Different student backgrounds and prior experience can provide important challenges for the learning experience and student learning outcome gains in HE settings, particularly in the context of large classes and scientific disciplines. Students coming from non-traditional academic backgrounds may experience significant difficulties, which can cause low performance and loss of motivation in continuing their studies. In light of this, a Peer Assisted Student Mentor (PASS) scheme has been conceptualised and implemented in the last few academic years within the School of Engineering & Built Environment, with the intent to further improve the student outcomes, enhancing continuation and retention rates. The project aims to provide our students with an additional and effective support opportunity route for challenging modules, e.g. highly maths-based or other modules requiring high problem-solving skills, across all levels (from 4 to 7). This consists in scheduled weekly student-mentor sessions, where a group of students from higher levels of the course help newer students struggling with their modules. Support may include reviewing theory, specific teaching material on BB, resolution methods of specific numerical exercises, preparation for typical exam questions, etc. The scheme has provided significant improvements, not only in terms of student outcomes in traditional low-performing modules, but also for building a stronger students’ sense of community, where mutual support and peer-to-peer learning are at the basis of a growth in sense of belonging, self-confidence, and motivation.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Oct 2026

Enhancing Active Learning in Large Core Engineering Courses: Strategies, Evidence-Based Insights, and Challenges

This article explores the integration of active learning strategies within large, required core courses in undergraduate engineering education, drawing on a case study of a faculty member teaching a Statics and Strength of Materials course to more than 200 students each semester. The focus is placed on pedagogical ad...

Elias Ali · 0 citations
Review Oct 2026

A Near-Peer Mentoring Framework for a CEE Curriculum: A Case Study

Many innovative pedagogical strategies, such as near-peer mentoring, have been developed to address challenges of the first-year college curriculum. Near-peer mentoring involves upper-level students mentoring lower-level students and has been shown to improve student outcomes, such as increased sense of belonging, in...

Casey J. Rodgers, A. Rahman, J. Roesler et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Community-Engaged Learning for Student Success

Community-engaged learning (CEL) with undergraduate students is a high-impact practice (HIP) which can lead to student success in a variety of dimensions, including in the labor force. CEL can enable students to confidently demonstrate the knowledge and skills that they learn in their majors. We describe three differen...

J. Waity, Jennifer Vanderminden · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Learning How to Measure STEM Student Critical Thinking Through Undergraduate Research Engagement Across a Three-Institution Consortium

Undergraduate research is a high-impact practice associated with positive student outcomes, including improved retention, graduation rates, and post-graduation success. It is also linked to gains in intellectual skills, such as critical thinking; however, these gains are typically inferred from student self-reports and...

Donna Chamely-Wiik, D. Meeroff, Evelyn Frazier et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Enhancing Engagement and Learning Through Incentivized Low-Stakes Quizzes in Large Engineering Classes

Extensive research highlights the benefits of active learning and frequent low-stakes assessment in improving student engagement in STEM education. However, large undergraduate engineering courses often rely on passive lecture delivery, limiting opportunities for meaningful participation and peer interaction. This stud...

Sana Shuja, Shaista Jabeen, M. Ahang et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.