Skip to content
Review Open access

Usage, Benefits and Challenges of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Mathematics: The Student Perspective

Jul 2026 · Education sciences · Vol 16, pp. 1172 · 1 citation · 50 references

TL;DR

This study investigates students’ decisions to use (or not use) GenAI for mathematics purposes and the reasons they give to support this choice, and reflects students’ self-reported reasons for this.

Abstract

The rapid influx of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) into higher education has resulted in a large number of research studies over the past three years. Much of the research to date has focused on the researcher/educator perspective of the optimal usage, benefits and challenges in the implementation of GenAI, often in a very general sense. The importance of the student voice and discipline-specific results must not be lost in this debate. This study investigates students’ decisions to use (or not use) GenAI for mathematics purposes and the reasons they give to support this choice. This was done by surveying almost 700 students in an Irish university, using an online, anonymous survey in March 2025. The students in the sample were all studying at least one mathematics module at the time. In addition, students were asked what they perceive the benefits and challenges to be of GenAI for mathematics in higher education. 91% of respondents were using GenAI for mathematics purposes. Both their reasons for using GenAI and the benefits they perceived for it fell into four main themes: Self-Improvement, Tools, Access, and Support. Their reasons for not using GenAI, and the challenges they perceived, were categorised under Unnecessary/Unknown, Inaccurate, Skill Loss, and Ethical Concerns. Students mentioned using GenAI for self-improvement reasons, such as bettering their understanding of mathematics, and found the lack of interaction with a person to be a benefit rather than a challenge. This study was conducted at a unique moment in time when the usage of GenAI was moving from sporadic to widespread and reflects students’ self-reported reasons for this.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Generative Artificial Intelligence in University Mathematics Instruction: Faculty Use and Future Prospects

This exploratory research contributes to the growing literature on GenAI adoption in higher education and offers guidance for professional development initiatives aimed at supporting ethical, effective, and pedagogically informed use of GenAI in university mathematics instruction.

Maryam Alarfaj · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

GENERATIVE AI AND ITS EFFECT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION

The results indicate a positive association between the utilization of GenAI tools and enhanced academic performance, most notably in the comprehension of complex programming concepts.

R. A. Sambetova, A. Veryaev, Ye.Z. Uxikbayev · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Students’ use of artificial intelligence in higher education, and their reflections on that use: an interview study

The present study complements existing research by providing explanations, reflections and qualitative insights into students’ use of AI in their studies and to identify the areas where students require assistance or lack information when utilising AI.

Hilde Marie Sandstrak, Pia Borlund · 0 citations

ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE Generative AI in higher education: efficiency, motivation and challenges in teaching business mathematics

The findings suggest that the conscious and pedagogically grounded integration of AI into mathematics education holds considerable potential, however, the development of critical awareness and the continued presence of human oversight remain essential to ensure meaningful learning outcomes.

Mária Bakó, S. Ke · 0 citations
Review Jul 2026

AI as a Study Partner in Mathematics Education: Evidence from a Multi-Program University Survey

The findings indicate that students integrate AI tools primarily as complementary learning aids rather than replacements for traditional materials, and highlights the growing importance of evaluating not only usage frequency but also perceived reliability and pedagogical value.

M. Altin, Kirsten Jäger, Silke Jütte et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.