A survey that can be used to assess students' AI knowledge and foresee its usefulness as a diagnostic that goes beyond understanding students' attitudes and perceptions of AI and GenAI use and tests multiple aspects of students' knowledge and conceptual understanding to enable the development of targeted instruction.
Abstract
In this research-to-practice paper we present a survey that can be used to assess students'AI knowledge. As the use of artificial intelligence (AI), including generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), has proliferated, so has the need to educate students about the topic. A range of AI literacy frameworks have been proposed, outlining the essential knowledge that students should have. Alongside, different ways of assessing AI knowledge have been developed. As yet, there is a lack of assessment instruments capable of evaluating multiple forms of student knowledge, including technical concepts, practical applications, and ethical concerns about AI use. In this article, we present a study implementing a comprehensive instrument to assess AI knowledge. The instrument combines measures from multiple scales to capture a range of literacy features and actual knowledge. We implemented the instrument in a higher education setting to assess its viability and usefulness and found that the instrument exhibited useful diagnostic capabilities and was able to identify common misconceptions among students. Although students performed well overall, there was a significant misunderstanding of how AI, especially GenAI systems, work. It also identified a lack of higher-level knowledge. The instrument is publicly available for use by others. We foresee its usefulness as a diagnostic that goes beyond understanding students'attitudes and perceptions of AI and GenAI use and tests multiple aspects of students'knowledge and conceptual understanding. This can enable the development of targeted instruction.
This study investigates the impact of the Modern Digital Skills course offered by the University of Jordan on students' digital literacy in Generative Artificial Intelligence to determine whether the course significantly enhances students' knowledge, proficiency, critical thinking, and ethical awareness.
Esra Alzaghoul, A. Assaf, Tahani Al-Khatib et al.· International Journal of Mod...· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence (AI) has become increasingly prominent in higher education, offering new possibilities for improving teaching practices and student learning experiences. Despite its growing adoption, limited evidence exists regarding how students perceive the benefits, challenges, and ethical implications assoc...
H. U. C. P. Hewawasam, D. Saparamadu· Sabaragamuwa University Jour...· 0 citations
This paper presents the development and initial validation of an instrument to measure self-efficacy while using GenAI to learn programming, and finds strong support for the validity of the existing Steinhorst instrument in a new context, specifically an introductory programming course that fully integrates GenAI.
J. Prather, Lauren E. Margulieux, Yekaterina Kharitonova et al.· International Computing Educ...· 0 citations
It is proposed that mathematical literacy in the AI era should extend beyond traditional competencies to include the ability to critically evaluate AI-generated outputs, identify algorithmic limitations, and use AI responsibly a construct this review tentatively terms Mathematical AI Literacy.
Andi Mangaraja, D. Hasibuan, Ramadhan Herianto et al.· Mathline : Jurnal Matematika...· 0 citations
The study found that appropriate uses of GAI tools in the research setting were not straightforwardly obvious for participants, and more is needed to frame the challenges posed by GAI tools for Higher Education across the world as a technical challenge for learning design or for training that addresses the AI literacy...
P. Kahn, Mark Carrigan, Ignacio Wyman et al.· Frontiers in Education· 0 citations
Different disciplinary differences emerged: students in language-focused disciplines exhibited cautious attitudes regarding AI’s influence on authorship and creativity, whereas those in technical sciences generally regarded AI as a neutral assistant with minimal concern for ethical or cognitive implications.
A. Kereibayeva, Fariza Abdraimova, T. Toktarova et al.· AI@DTESI· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.