Oct 2026· Forests· Vol 17, pp. 1249· 0 citations· 78 references
Abstract
Forest restoration is increasingly expected to contribute to climate-change mitigation by rebuilding biomass and carbon stocks, yet the persistence of these gains remains uncertain as environmental conditions continue to change. This challenge reflects a temporal mismatch: restoration decisions are made today, whereas restored forests must accumulate and retain carbon for decades. We argue that this mismatch involves two interacting dimensions. Climate and disturbance regimes may change substantially after establishment, while succession simultaneously reorganizes the community responsible for carbon accumulation and retention through recruitment, growth, mortality and species turnover. Restoration therefore confronts two moving targets, the environment in which carbon must persist and the forest that maintains it. We distinguish carbon recovery, the rebuilding of forest carbon stocks following degradation or land-use change, from carbon persistence, the capacity to retain substantial carbon as ecological communities and environmental conditions change through time. In this conceptual perspective, we develop a trajectory-based view of carbon persistence that examines how successional change reshapes the demographic and functional basis of carbon storage and how vulnerability to climatic stress is distributed among carbon-contributing species. We integrate these processes through two complementary pathways, dominance and functional response diversity, and consider how their relative importance may change through succession and environmental exposure. Climate-resilient restoration should therefore consider not only how much carbon is recovered, but whether the recovering forest’s ecological trajectory can retain that carbon under plausible future climatic and disturbance conditions.
For decades, the debate over whether erosion acts as a carbon source or sink has advanced our understanding of carbon redistribution across stocks and fluxes. Yet, this quantitative perspective alone does not capture the full ecological significance of carbon along these pathways. Carbon value lies not only in how much...
Carbon sequestration through ecosystem restoration has emerged as a critical strategy for mitigating climatechange while simultaneously enhancing biodiversity, soil health, and ecosystem resilience. Degraded forests,wetlands, grasslands, mangroves, and agricultural landscapes possess substantial potential to captureand...
K. Arun, Shashi S. Yadav· Public Health - Open Journal· 0 citations
Changing climatic conditions and disturbance regimes are reshaping ecosystems globally, with profound implications for forest carbon dynamics. Because California’s forests represent a substantial carbon sink, understanding how climate-driven disturbances will alter their capacity to store and sequester carbon is crit...
Charles J. Maxwell, B. Sleeter, M. Hurteau et al.· Carbon Balance and Managemen...· 0 citations
Forest degradation and desertification are closely connected components of a broader socio-ecological problem in which land-use pressure, climatic stress and declining ecosystem resilience interact across landscapes. Forest degradation does not necessarily involve complete removal of tree cover; it may occur through bi...
Shaheen Ayaiz Rather· International journal of res...· 0 citations
By virtue of their size and mobility, large animals can play important roles in Earth's carbon cycle. This has led to suggestions that restoring their populations can contribute to mitigating the climate crisis through removal and storage of atmospheric carbon. However, as animals can affect both release and sequestrat...
A. J. Abraham, J. Roman, Heidi C. Pearson et al.· Current Biology· 0 citations
Due to climate change, forest growth conditions are changing and may become unfavorable for the tree species currently growing in different regions across the EU. Forest managers can actively plant trees that are better adapted not only to current site conditions but also to those expected in the future. Given the long...
Florian Kraxner, D. Schepaschenko, G. Kindermann et al.· Forests· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.