Aug 2026· Breast Cancer Research and Treatment· Vol 218· 0 citations· 37 references
Medicine
TL;DR
This analysis provides external validation of the novel prognostic staging system for breast cancer that incorporates age and demonstrated refined risk stratification compared with the current American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging schema.
Abstract
Age at diagnosis is an independent prognostic variable for breast cancer-specific and overall survival (OS). We previously developed a novel prognostic staging system that incorporates age and demonstrated refined risk stratification compared with the current American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging schema. We now aim to externally validate this staging system. The National Cancer Database was used to identify adult females diagnosed with invasive breast cancer from 2010-2015. Women with prior malignancy, unknown vital status, or unknown AJCC clinical prognostic stage (CPS) variables were excluded. Serial multivariable Cox’s proportional hazards models evaluated associations between OS and CPS +/- age +/- effect modification (CPS by age interaction). Models were evaluated using concordance index (C-index). Among 663,659 patients, the median age was 60 years (IQR 51-70) and the median follow-up was 91.3 months. At last follow-up, 133,273 patients (20.1%) were dead. The model that incorporated both age and effect modification had the highest C-index (0.7852, versus 0.6881 for the model excluding age and 0.7847 for the model without effect modification), indicative of the best predictive performance. Using this model to predict OS stratified by CPS showed differential survival across the age spectrum, consistent with the initial model. Within each stage group, women diagnosed at age 40 had the best survival, whereas women at the extremes of age had inferior survival. This analysis provides external validation of our novel prognostic staging system for breast cancer. Future editions of AJCC may consider incorporating age to achieve more accurate survival predictions.
A prognostic nomogram developed and validated exclusively in a large cohort of non-metastatic Asian American BC patients from the SEER database, incorporating modern molecular subtypes to improve prognostic stratification for this understudied population is presented.
Background Breast cancer (BC) mortality risk extends over decades; yet, the temporal prognostic patterns of histological grade across subtypes and stages remain unclear. Patients and methods Women with stage I-III BC diagnosed between 2000 and 2018 were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results regist...
M. Mariani, M. Ochocki, G. Bianchini et al.· ESMO Open· 0 citations
A clinical model incorporating age (≥65 years), T stage (T3/T4), N stage (N2/N3), and chemotherapy (no) was developed to predict inferior OS in early-stage MedBC.
Y. Tan, X. Tian, Q. Li et al.· Hong Kong medical journal =...· 0 citations
This internally validated nomogram provides individualized, time-updated BCSS estimates and may support dynamic risk stratification during long-term follow-up, although external validation is required before clinical implementation.
A clinical predictive model was established to estimate 3-, 4-, and 5-year survival rates for LACSC patients and exhibited significantly poorer overall survival in both cohorts (P < 0.05).
Ting-Ting Zou, Xu-Peng Wang, Hai-Xia Wu et al.· Frontiers in Oncology· 0 citations
Abstract Background Stage at diagnosis, histologic grade, and molecular subtypes are established prognostic indicators for women with breast cancer (BC), but their impact on population-based survival estimates is poorly documented. This study assessed long-term BC survival trends according to these factors. Methods We...
Fabiola Giudici, D. Serraino, F. Puglisi et al.· The Oncologist· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.