Skip to content

Similar papers

Conference Open access 2026

Spectral Disentanglement: Rank-Aware Task Adaptation for Rehearsal-free Continual Learning in LLMs

Continual Learning (CL) for Large Language Models (LLMs) faces a fundamental Stability-Plasticity Dilemma : balancing the plasticity to acquire new capabilities with the stability to preserve prior knowledge. While Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning methods, such as LoRA, enable efficient adaptation, we identify a critical flaw in current approaches termed Rank-Blindness : the enforcement of a single rank constraint across diverse tasks, which entangles task-shared and task-specific knowledge, leading to catastrophic forgetting of earlier tasks and underfitting on complex new ones. To address this, we propose S PA RTA, a novel rehearsal-free framework guided by a rank-spectrum perspective that explicitly dis-entangles knowledge into two orthogonal sub-spaces. Specifically, S PA RTA employs a low-rank branch to capture task-shared representations and a high-rank branch to model task-specific features. To integrate these complementary representations, we introduce a context-aware dynamic router that adaptively fuses the two branches based on input semantics, while an explicit orthogonality constraint minimizes interference between shared and specific parameter subspaces. This design effectively isolates task-specific updates from shared knowledge, preventing the overwriting of prior capabilities while preserving strong adaptation capacity. Extensive experiments demonstrate that S PA RTA achieves a superior stability-plasticity balance compared to single-rank baselines. Notably, the proposed spectral disentanglement strategy substantially reduces inter-task interference and yields strong zero-shot generalization on unseen tasks. Our code will be available at https://github. com/Xnhyacinth/SpaRTA .

Huanxuan Liao, Shizhu He, Yupu Hao et al. · 1 citation · ⚡1
Conference Open access 2026

Counteracting the Matthew Effect in Self-Improvement of LVLMs through Head-Tail Re-balancing

To mitigate a critical imbalance during the exploration-and-learning process, this work approaches head-tail re-balance during the exploration-and-learning process from two perspectives: distribution-reshaping and trajectory-resampling.

Xin Guo, Zhiheng Xi, Yiwen Ding et al. · 1 citation
Preprint Jul 2026

How LLM Task-Adaptation Reshapes Alignment: A Multi-dimensional Study of Behavioral and Representational Drift

A systematic evaluation of representative task-adaptation methods shows that task adaptation is not merely a capability-improving step, but an alignment intervention in its own right, motivating multi-dimensional alignment evaluation as a standard component of post-training pipelines.

James Elcock, William F. Shen, Xinchi Qiu et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Socialized Division and Collaboration: Rethinking Class-Incremental Learning under Optimization Conflicts

Class-incremental learning is commonly instantiated as a single-model paradigm, where a unified model sequentially adapts to an unbounded stream of sessions. While effective under mild distributional shifts, this formulation becomes strained when successive sessions induce incompatible optimization directions, leading to destructive interference and catastrophic forgetting. We argue that such forgetting reflects a structural limitation of enforcing heterogeneous learning dynamics within a single parameter space. Motivated by social solidarity theory, we propose Socialized Division and Collaboration (SDC) as a reformulation of continual learning that decomposes session learning across specialized models in response to optimization conflicts, while enabling coordinated collaboration. To support this formulation with a principled allocation mechanism, we introduce an energy-based session-model compatibility criterion grounded in Helmholtz free energy, which guides adaptive session allocation and model evolution under conflicting objectives. This framework integrates session assignment, model evolution, and collaborative inference into a unified pipeline, offering an alternative to monolithic continual learning formulations and highlighting a broader design principle for learning under persistent optimization conflicts.

Xinjie Yao, Zhihe Fan, Yunqi Zhu et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Progressive Content Refinement with Decaying Reward Joint LinUCB

Iterative refinement has significantly enhanced Large Language Model (LLM) performance; however, existing methods ranging from feedback-based Self-Refine to traditional bandit approaches often rely on static options or overlook the saturation effect. This neglect leads to over-exploitation, where the continuous use of identical prompts or arms results in diminishing rewards over time. To address this challenge, we propose a novel contextual bandit algorithm that explicitly incorporates reward decay modeling. Utilizing an Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm, our method simultaneously estimates both arm-specific and decay parameters. Furthermore, by embedding prompts as arms, we facilitate the joint learning of arm values, distinguishing our approach from the traditional disjoint Linear Upper Confidence Bound (LinUCB) framework. Experimental results on Sentiment Reversal and GSM8K benchmarks demonstrate that our method achieves significant performance gains over strong baselines. Finally, our ablation study confirms that the integration of reward decay modeling within the bandit framework is crucial for mitigating over-exploitation and optimizing the iterative refinement process.

Shion Ishikawa, Pablo Loyola, Young-joo Chung et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Jul 2026

To Retain or to Adapt? Generalizing Continual Learning

The Continual Learning (CL) literature has long been driven by the goal of mitigating catastrophic forgetting. This objective rests on a pervasive, often unstated assumption: that a lifelong learner should approximate the Joint-Task Learning (JTL) solution and retain all previously acquired knowledge. We challenge this retention-centered premise, arguing that in non-stationary environments prioritizing retention can impede real-time adaptation. Shifting the focus to the Average Lifelong Error (ALE), we formalize CL as an online optimization problem governed by the interaction between environmental and learning dynamics. We introduce Transfer Efficiency as a quantitative measure of the tension between Instability, the bias inherited from conflicting past experience, and Transient Error, the optimization cost of learning new tasks from scratch. Under mild convergence conditions, holding across linear and neural network models, this decomposition yields a Critical Task Duration: a closed-form threshold beyond which historical knowledge transitions from a warm-start advantage to an optimization liability whenever retention induces a positive stationary bias. We validate these theoretical predictions on continual image classification and reinforcement learning benchmarks. Finally, by connecting continual learning to the online learning framework of predictable sequences, we show that JTL is only one instance of a broader family of objectives, and we propose a new general class of continual learning algorithms, which we call Predictive Continual Learning. Predictive CL algorithms optimize expected future performance under an explicit, dynamically updated model of future tasks. As a proof of concept, we analyze a Window algorithm that interpolates between JTL and Independent-Task Learning (ITL), outperforming both under controlled distributional drift.

Giulia Lanzillotta, Mandana Samiei, D. Precup et al. · 0 citations