Skip to content
Open access

Impact of PI-RADS During Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer on Pathological Findings at Repeat Biopsy

Aug 2026 · In Vivo · Vol 40, pp. 2994 - 3002 · 0 citations · 14 references
Medicine

TL;DR

At one year, a PI-RADS score ≥3 was associated with a higher risk of reclassification, whereas a score ≤2 was associated with a greater likelihood of no cancer on rebiopsy, highlighting the prognostic value of MRI in guiding active surveillance.

Abstract

Background/Aim: This study aimed to determine whether lesion visibility on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) predicts rebiopsy outcomes during active surveillance for prostate cancer. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 111 patients enrolled in the Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance study (Japan) at Kagawa University (January 2010–February 2025). After excluding 19 patients who discontinued active surveillance within one year, 92 patients were included in the analysis. MRI findings were classified as visible [Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score ≥3] or invisible (score ≤2). We assessed the association between visibility and rebiopsy outcomes, defined as reclassification progression beyond active surveillance criteria or no cancer. Results: MRI was performed at diagnosis in 32.6% (n=32) of patients, at one year in 37.0% (n=34), and at four years in 47.7% (n=21). Lesion visibility at diagnosis was not associated with continuation of active surveillance compared with invisibility [median 43 months, 95% confidence interval (12-not available) vs. not available (17-not available), p=0.404]. However, at the 1-year rebiopsy, reclassification occurred significantly more frequently in patients with visible lesions than in those with invisible lesions (42.1% vs. 7.1%, p=0.047). Conversely, no cancer was more common in patients with invisible lesions (50.0% vs. 10.5%, p=0.019). Conclusion: At one year, a PI-RADS score ≥3 was associated with a higher risk of reclassification, whereas a score ≤2 was associated with a greater likelihood of no cancer on rebiopsy. These findings highlight the prognostic value of MRI in guiding active surveillance.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the active surveillance of prostate cancer: state of the art.

POURPOSE To provide an update on the role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in active surveillance (AS) of prostate cancer, with particular focus on standardizing image acquisition and reporting through PI-RADS v2.1, PI-QUAL v2, and PRECISE v2, as well as their clinical implications in risk stratifi...

V. Testini, L. Eusebi, Giuseppe Sortino et al. · 1 citation
Open access Aug 2026

Reducing the burden of active surveillance monitoring examinations in prostate cancer: Insights from real-world data to inform clinical practice.

A model using simple, routine parameters and PSA doubling time can identify those at minimal risk of reclassification, enabling a safe reduction in biopsy intensity, and advocates for a risk-adaptive AS protocol.

C. Marenghi, F. Badenchini, B. Avuzzi et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Effect of MRI and site variation on surgical treatment for prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND Increased utilization of prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) over the past decade may have led to a system shift in the patient population selected for radical prostatectomy (RP). We evaluated whether the initial use of MRI before biopsy resulted in the selection of lower-risk patients for RP. MATERI...

Mitchell M. Huang, Joseph D. Nicolas, Ridwan Alam et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Association of PI-RADS Score with Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer and Histopathological Upgrading in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy: A Retrospective Single-Centre Study

Background and Objectives: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is widely used in prostate cancer diagnosis, but biopsy findings may still underestimate tumor aggressiveness. This study evaluated the association of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) assessment with clinically significant...

H. A. Krzepkowski, T. Ząbkowski, A. Wieczorek et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.