This work presents an uncertainty-aware DL framework that jointly captures epistemic (model) and aleatoric ( data) uncertainty to enhance short-term wildfire danger forecasting and significantly improves the accuracy and reliability of wildfire danger forecasting, advancing the development of trustworthy wildfire DL systems.
Abstract
Wildfires are among the most severe natural hazards, posing a significant threat to both humans and natural ecosystems. The growing risk of wildfires increases the demand for forecasting models that are not only accurate but also reliable. deep learning (DL) has shown promise in predicting wildfire danger; however, its adoption is hindered by concerns over the reliability of its predictions, some of which stem from the lack of uncertainty quantification. To address this challenge, we present an uncertainty-aware DL framework that jointly captures epistemic (model) and aleatoric (data) uncertainty to enhance short-term wildfire danger forecasting. In the next-day forecasting, our best-performing model improves the area under the precision-recall curve by 1.1% and reduces the expected calibration error by 1.5% compared to a deterministic baseline, enhancing both predictive skill and calibration. Our experiments confirm the reliability of the uncertainty estimates and illustrate their practical utility for decision support, including the identification of uncertainty thresholds for rejecting low-confidence predictions and the generation of well-calibrated wildfire danger maps with accompanying uncertainty layers. Extending the forecast horizon up to ten days, we observe that aleatoric uncertainty increases with time, showing greater variability in environmental conditions, while epistemic uncertainty remains stable. Finally, we show that although the two uncertainty types may be redundant in low-uncertainty cases, they provide complementary insights under more challenging conditions, underscoring the value of their joint modeling for robust wildfire danger prediction. In summary, our approach significantly improves the accuracy and reliability of wildfire danger forecasting, advancing the development of trustworthy wildfire DL systems.
Next-day wildfire prediction requires models whose forecasts can be evaluated alongside the assumptions and historical evidence used in their computation. Although deep learning can learn spatial patterns from remote-sensing data, predictive performance alone does not establish physical fidelity or operational trustwor...
Miguel Esparza, Aydin Ayanzadeh Ahmad Mousavi, Ali Mostafavi· 0 citations
Prediction of post-wildfire debris flows is critical for mitigating hazards to communities, infrastructure, and resources during intense rainfall in recently burned areas. However, identifying reliable machine learning models is complicated by overlapping debris-flow and non-debris-flow events in feature space, the nee...
Quinn Ledingham, Zheng-Sen Xu, Yi-Min Zhu et al.· 0 citations
An Adaptive Trust-Aware Hierarchical Multimodal Learning Network (ATHML-Net) that combines drone image features, satellite observations, meteorological factors, and terrain data in a single cyber-resilient learning system is introduced, providing a robust, accurate, and cyber-resilient solution for real-time forest fir...
Santhosh Chandra Konduru, Sujatha Lakshmi Narra, Hareshbhai Miyani et al.· JOIV: International Journal...· 0 citations
Explicit onshore tsunami inundation forecasting can improve public risk awareness, but deterministically predicted inundation boundaries under highly uncertain conditions, such as near-field tsunamis generated by megathrust earthquakes, may falsely imply safety outside the boundaries. Consequently, current warnings pri...
Y. Oishi, Takashi Furumura, Fumihiko Imamura· 0 citations
Context-Aware Concept Distillation (CACD) is proposed, a framework developed in collaboration with domain experts to distill opaque LSTMs into interpretable, hydrology-aware surrogate models and a Residual Hypernetwork that dynamically modulates these concepts based on static basin characteristics.
Eli Levinkopf, E. Morin, Claudia V. Goldman· Proceedings of the Thirty-Fi...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.